Stuppy v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, et al

Filing 16

ORDER Granting Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s 14 Motion to Stay Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/25/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
    1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 SHEILA K. STUPPY, 8 v. 9 10 Case No. 2:16-cv-02954-JCM-PAL Plaintiff, ORDER (Mot Stay Disc – ECF No. 14) WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants. 11 12 Before the court is Defendants’ Motion to Stay Discovery (ECF No. 14). No opposition 13 has been filed and the time for filing an opposition has expired. The motion requests staying 14 discovery until after ruling on the pending Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 10), which is pending 15 before the district judge. 16 A review of the docket shows that Plaintiff did not file an opposition to the motion to 17 dismiss. The clerk of court entered and served plaintiff, who is appearing pro se, with the court’s 18 standard order regarding the requirements of Klingele v. Eickeberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), 19 and Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998), on February 6, 2017. Plaintiff was notified 20 she had 14 days to file and serve points and authorities in opposition to the motion to dismiss. See 21 Min. Order (ECF No 12). On February 24, 2017, defendant filed a notice that plaintiff had not 22 opposed the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 13), and this motion to stay. Plaintiff has still not filed 23 an opposition to the motion to dismiss or requested an extension of time in which to file an 24 opposition. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1     1 2 3 IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s Motion to Stay Discovery (ECF No. 14) is GRANTED. Dated this 25th day of April, 2017. 4 5 PEGGY A. LEEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?