Stuppy v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, et al

Filing 8

ORDER Granting 7 Ex Parte Motion to Extend Time (Second Request) to Respond to Complaint. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage's answer due 2/2/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/18/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-02954-JCM-PAL Document 7 Filed 01/17/17 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Robin E. Perkins, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9891 Tanya N. Peters, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8855 SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: (702) 784-5200 Facsimile: (702) 784-5252 Email: rperkins@swlaw.com Email: tpeters@swlaw.com Attorneys for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (also incorrectly named as Wells Fargo Home Mortgage) 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 702.784.5200 SHEILA K. STUPPY, 12 Plaintiff, CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-02954-JCM-PAL 13 vs. 14 15 WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., CLEAR RECON CORP.; DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.’S EX PARTE MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 16 Defendants. (Second Request) 17 18 19 20 21 22 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7(b) and Local Rules 6-2 and 7-5(b) for the District of Nevada, Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., also incorrectly sued as Wells Fargo Home Mortgage (“Wells Fargo”) respectfully submits this Ex Parte Motion to Extend Deadline to Respond to the Complaint filed by Plaintiff Sheila K. Stuppy (“Plaintiff”), which was removed to this Court on December 21, 2016 (the “Motion”).1 23 24 25 Wells Fargo respectfully requests a second extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, for fourteen (14) days, to February 2, 2017. In support of this Motion, Wells Fargo states as follows: 26 1. On or about December 2, 2016, Plaintiff commenced an action in the District 27 28 1 The filing of this Motion does not waive any of Defendants’ rights or remedies and the Defendants explicitly preserve all of their rights, claims and defenses. Case 2:16-cv-02954-JCM-PAL Document 7 Filed 01/17/17 Page 2 of 4 1 Court of the State of Nevada, Clark County, styled Stuppy v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Wells 2 Fargo Bank, N.A., Clear Recon Corp. (Case No. A-16-747526-C). 3 2. On December 21, 2016, Wells Fargo removed the action to this Court. 4 3. In accordance with the prior order of this Court, Wells Fargo’s Answer or other 5 6 response is due on January 19, 2017 [Docket No. 5]. 4. There are currently no scheduled hearings in this case. A short extension to file a 7 response will not unduly delay the proceedings. There will be no adverse effect or prejudice to 8 any of the parties if this Motion is granted. 9 10 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 702.784.5200 11 5. Wells Fargo’s counsel requires an additional brief extension to prepare its response due to the holidays and client coordination efforts. 6. Wells Fargo has made efforts to stipulate as to an extension of time. Plaintiff has 12 filed this action pro se, and did not list a phone number or an email address on the case cover 13 sheet of the original action. Counsel for Wells Fargo left a message for Plaintiff today, January 14 17, 2017, regarding this requested extension. Additionally, Plaintiff has not responded to 15 multiple phone messages and emails to Plaintiff from Wells Fargo since December 2016. 16 7. Furthermore, a Joint Status Report is due to the Court on January 20, 2017. 17 Counsel for Wells Fargo mailed a proposed Joint Status Report to Plaintiff on January 13, 2017, 18 but has not yet received a response. 19 9. Pursuant to LR 7-5(b), good cause exists as to why this Motion has been submitted 20 to the Court without prior notice to Plaintiff. Wells Fargo attempted to discuss an extension with 21 Plaintiff, but Wells Fargo does not have an email address or other known phone number for 22 Plaintiff. 23 10. Wells Fargo has previously requested one extension of time from this Court. 24 25 26 27 28 -2- Case 2:16-cv-02954-JCM-PAL Document 7 Filed 01/17/17 Page 3 of 4 1 WHEREFORE, Wells Fargo respectfully requests that this Court enter an Order extending 2 the time for its response to the Complaint for an additional fourteen (14) days, to February 2, 3 2017. 4 5 Dated: January 17, 2017 SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 6 7 By: /s/ Tanya N. Peters Robin E. Perkins, Esq. Tanya N. Peters, Esq. 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Attorneys for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (also incorrectly named as Wells Fargo Home Mortgage) 8 9 10 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 702.784.5200 11 12 ORDER 13 14 Based on the foregoing and for good cause, IT IS ORDERED THAT Wells Fargo’s 15 16 17 deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint is extended to February 2, 2017. IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 20 MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED January 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- 18 , 2017. Case 2:16-cv-02954-JCM-PAL Document 7 Filed 01/17/17 Page 4 of 4 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I hereby declare under penalty of perjury, that I am over the age of eighteen (18) years, 3 and I am not a party to, nor interested in, this action. On this date, I caused to be served a true 4 and correct copy of the foregoing DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.’s EX PARTE 5 MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT by the 6 method indicated below: 7 ___X____ U.S. Mail _______ Federal Express _______ U.S. Certified Mail ______ Electronic Service _______ Facsimile Transmission _______ Hand Delivery _______ Overnight Mail 8 9 10 11 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 702.784.5200 and addressed to the following: 12 13 14 15 Sheila K. Stuppy P.O. Box 750725 Las Vegas, Nevada 89136 Plaintiff 16 17 DATED this 17th day of January, 2017. 18 /s/ Nissa Riley An Employee of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. 19 20 21 25401172.1 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?