Stuppy v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, et al
Filing
8
ORDER Granting 7 Ex Parte Motion to Extend Time (Second Request) to Respond to Complaint. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage's answer due 2/2/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/18/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Case 2:16-cv-02954-JCM-PAL Document 7 Filed 01/17/17 Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Robin E. Perkins, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9891
Tanya N. Peters, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8855
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Telephone: (702) 784-5200
Facsimile: (702) 784-5252
Email: rperkins@swlaw.com
Email: tpeters@swlaw.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (also incorrectly
named as Wells Fargo Home Mortgage)
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11
Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
702.784.5200
SHEILA K. STUPPY,
12
Plaintiff,
CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-02954-JCM-PAL
13
vs.
14
15
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE;
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., CLEAR
RECON CORP.;
DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO
BANK, N.A.’S EX PARTE
MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT
16
Defendants.
(Second Request)
17
18
19
20
21
22
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7(b) and Local Rules 6-2 and 7-5(b) for the
District of Nevada, Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., also incorrectly sued as Wells Fargo
Home Mortgage (“Wells Fargo”) respectfully submits this Ex Parte Motion to Extend Deadline to
Respond to the Complaint filed by Plaintiff Sheila K. Stuppy (“Plaintiff”), which was removed to
this Court on December 21, 2016 (the “Motion”).1
23
24
25
Wells Fargo respectfully requests a second extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s
Complaint, for fourteen (14) days, to February 2, 2017. In support of this Motion, Wells Fargo
states as follows:
26
1.
On or about December 2, 2016, Plaintiff commenced an action in the District
27
28
1
The filing of this Motion does not waive any of Defendants’ rights or remedies and the Defendants
explicitly preserve all of their rights, claims and defenses.
Case 2:16-cv-02954-JCM-PAL Document 7 Filed 01/17/17 Page 2 of 4
1
Court of the State of Nevada, Clark County, styled Stuppy v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Wells
2
Fargo Bank, N.A., Clear Recon Corp. (Case No. A-16-747526-C).
3
2.
On December 21, 2016, Wells Fargo removed the action to this Court.
4
3.
In accordance with the prior order of this Court, Wells Fargo’s Answer or other
5
6
response is due on January 19, 2017 [Docket No. 5].
4.
There are currently no scheduled hearings in this case. A short extension to file a
7
response will not unduly delay the proceedings. There will be no adverse effect or prejudice to
8
any of the parties if this Motion is granted.
9
10
Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
702.784.5200
11
5.
Wells Fargo’s counsel requires an additional brief extension to prepare its response
due to the holidays and client coordination efforts.
6.
Wells Fargo has made efforts to stipulate as to an extension of time. Plaintiff has
12
filed this action pro se, and did not list a phone number or an email address on the case cover
13
sheet of the original action. Counsel for Wells Fargo left a message for Plaintiff today, January
14
17, 2017, regarding this requested extension. Additionally, Plaintiff has not responded to
15
multiple phone messages and emails to Plaintiff from Wells Fargo since December 2016.
16
7.
Furthermore, a Joint Status Report is due to the Court on January 20, 2017.
17
Counsel for Wells Fargo mailed a proposed Joint Status Report to Plaintiff on January 13, 2017,
18
but has not yet received a response.
19
9.
Pursuant to LR 7-5(b), good cause exists as to why this Motion has been submitted
20
to the Court without prior notice to Plaintiff. Wells Fargo attempted to discuss an extension with
21
Plaintiff, but Wells Fargo does not have an email address or other known phone number for
22
Plaintiff.
23
10.
Wells Fargo has previously requested one extension of time from this Court.
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Case 2:16-cv-02954-JCM-PAL Document 7 Filed 01/17/17 Page 3 of 4
1
WHEREFORE, Wells Fargo respectfully requests that this Court enter an Order extending
2
the time for its response to the Complaint for an additional fourteen (14) days, to February 2,
3
2017.
4
5
Dated: January 17, 2017
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
6
7
By: /s/ Tanya N. Peters
Robin E. Perkins, Esq.
Tanya N. Peters, Esq.
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Attorneys for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
(also incorrectly named as Wells Fargo Home
Mortgage)
8
9
10
Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
702.784.5200
11
12
ORDER
13
14
Based on the foregoing and for good cause, IT IS ORDERED THAT Wells Fargo’s
15
16
17
deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint is extended to February 2, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
20
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DATED January
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
18
, 2017.
Case 2:16-cv-02954-JCM-PAL Document 7 Filed 01/17/17 Page 4 of 4
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I hereby declare under penalty of perjury, that I am over the age of eighteen (18) years,
3
and I am not a party to, nor interested in, this action. On this date, I caused to be served a true
4
and correct copy of the foregoing DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.’s EX PARTE
5
MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT by the
6
method indicated below:
7
___X____
U.S. Mail
_______
Federal Express
_______
U.S. Certified Mail
______
Electronic Service
_______
Facsimile Transmission
_______
Hand Delivery
_______
Overnight Mail
8
9
10
11
Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
702.784.5200
and addressed to the following:
12
13
14
15
Sheila K. Stuppy
P.O. Box 750725
Las Vegas, Nevada 89136
Plaintiff
16
17
DATED this 17th day of January, 2017.
18
/s/ Nissa Riley
An Employee of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
19
20
21
25401172.1
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?