Sullivan v. CIT Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
25
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 23 the parties' proposed stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order is DENIED without prejudice pending resolution of 24 Defendant's motion to stay discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/20/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
ETIENNE A. SULLIVAN,
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
15
Pending before the Court is the parties’ proposed stipulated discovery plan and scheduling
16
order. Docket No. 23. Defendant CIT Bank, N.A. has separately filed a motion to stay discovery.
17
Docket No. 24. Accordingly, the parties’ proposed stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order,
18
Docket No. 23, is DENIED without prejudice pending resolution of Defendant’s motion to stay
19
discovery.
10
Plaintiff(s),
11
vs.
12
CIT BANK, N.A., et al.,
13
Defendant(s).
20
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
Case No. 2:16-cv-02985-RFB-NJK
DATED: March 20, 2017
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?