Sullivan v. CIT Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 25

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 23 the parties' proposed stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order is DENIED without prejudice pending resolution of 24 Defendant's motion to stay discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/20/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9

ETIENNE A. SULLIVAN,

14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

15

Pending before the Court is the parties’ proposed stipulated discovery plan and scheduling

16

order. Docket No. 23. Defendant CIT Bank, N.A. has separately filed a motion to stay discovery.

17

Docket No. 24. Accordingly, the parties’ proposed stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order,

18

Docket No. 23, is DENIED without prejudice pending resolution of Defendant’s motion to stay

19

discovery.

10

Plaintiff(s),

11

vs.

12

CIT BANK, N.A., et al.,

13
Defendant(s).

20

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21

Case No. 2:16-cv-02985-RFB-NJK

DATED: March 20, 2017

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge