Sullivan v. CIT Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 27

ORDER that 24 Motion to Stay Discovery is GRANTED. Discovery is stayed as to this defendant. Plaintiff and CIT Bank shall file a joint proposed discovery plan and scheduling order within 14 days of the resolution of Defendants motion to dismiss, in the event it is not granted in full. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 4/4/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 11 12 13 14 ETIENNE A. SULLIVAN, ) ) ) Plaintiff(s), ) ) vs. ) ) CIT BANK, N.A., et al., ) ) Defendant(s). ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:16-cv-02985-RFB-NJK ORDER (Docket No. 24) 15 Pending before the Court is a motion to stay discovery pending resolution of Defendant CIT 16 Bank, N.A.’s motion to dismiss. See Docket No. 24; see also Docket No. 16 (motion to dismiss). 17 No response was filed. See Docket. Therefore, the Court may properly grant the motion as 18 unopposed. See Local Rule 7-2(d). Additionally, the Court has reviewed Defendant’s motion and 19 finds it meritorious. Accordingly, Defendant’s motion to stay discovery, Docket No. 24, is hereby 20 GRANTED. Discovery is stayed as to this defendant. Plaintiff and CIT Bank shall file a joint 21 proposed discovery plan and scheduling order within 14 days of the resolution of Defendant’s 22 motion to dismiss, in the event it is not granted in full. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 DATED: April 4, 2017. 25 26 27 28 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?