Pinchuk v. CIT Bank et al

Filing 90

ORDER granting 86 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Attorney Brian C. Vanderhoof is substituted in place and stead of Jacob D Bundick. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 3/27/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-02986-RFB-GWF Document 86 Filed 03/26/18 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 BRIAN C. VANDERHOOF (10463) LECLAIRRYAN LLP 725 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 350 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Tel: 213-488-0503 Email: Brian.Vanderhoof@leclairryan.com DAVID V. WILSON II (10278) MEHAFFY WEBER PC 400 South 4th Street, Suite 500 Las Vegas, NV 89101 Tel: 702-448.7981 Email: DavidWilson@mehaffyweber.com Attorneys for Defendant CIT BANK, N.A. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 STATE OF NEVADA 13 14 STEVEN G. PINCHUCK, Plaintiff, 15 16 17 18 19 Case No: 2:16-cv-02986-RFB-GWF Hon. Richard F. Boulware vs. CIT BANK, N.A.; and EQUIFAX, INC., SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY 2:16-cv-02986-RFB-GWF Case 2:16-cv-02986-RFB-GWF Document 86 Filed 03/26/18 Page 2 of 2 1 Defendant CIT BANK, N.A. hereby substitutes Brian C. Vanderhoof of 2 LeClairRyan LLP, 725 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 350, Los Angeles, California 3 90017; Telephone: (213) 488-0503 attorneys of record in place and stead of Jacob 4 D. Bundick of Greenberg Traurig, LLP. 5 DATED: March 26, 2018 6 /s/ Rebecca Marks 7 Rebecca Marks for CIT Bank, N.A. 8 9 10 I consent to the above substitution. 11 DATED: March 26, 2018 12 /s/ Jacob D. Bundick 13 Jacob D. Bundick, Esq. 14 15 I am duly admitted to practice in this District. 16 Above substitution accepted. 17 DATED: March 26, 2018 18 /s/ Brian C. Vanderhoof 19 Brian C. Vanderhoof, Esq. 20 21 Please check one: ____ RETAINED, or _____ APPOINTED BY THE COURT 22 23 24 APPROVED: March ___, 2018 DATED: _______27 25 26 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 2 SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY 2:16-cv-02986-RFB-GWF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?