In Re DMCA Section 512(H) Subpoena to Borjan Solutions, S.L.
Filing
5
ORDER that Petitioner's Request for Issuance of Subpoena (ECF No. 1 ) and Motion to Vacate Order (ECF No. 4 ) are granted. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall vacate the Order (ECF No. 3 ), issued on September 27, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 10/2/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
10
11
12
IN RE:
)
)
DMCA SECTION 512(H)
)
SUBPOENA TO BORJAN SOLUTIONS, S.L
)
)
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:16-cv-03006-JAD-GWF
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Petitioner’s Request for Issuance of Subpoena (ECF No.
13
1), filed on December 23, 2016. Also before the Court is Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate Order (ECF
14
No. 4), filed September 29, 2017.
15
On December 23, 2016, Petitioner AMA Multimedia, LLC (“AMA”) filed its Request for
16
Issuance of Subpoena. ECF No. 1. On September 27, 2017, the Court denied Petitioner’s request
17
without prejudice for failure to attach a proposed subpoena as required by 17 U.S.C § 512. § 512(h)
18
of the DMCA provides that “a copyright owner or person authorized to act on the owner’s behalf
19
may request the clerk of any United States district court to issue a subpoena to a service provider for
20
identification of an alleged infringer.” The request may be made by filing “(A) a copy of a
21
notification described in subsection (c) (3)(A); (B) a proposed subpoena; and (c) a sworn declaration
22
to the effect that the purpose for which the subpoena is sought to obtain the identity of an alleged
23
infringer and that such information will only be used for protecting the rights under this title.”
24
Petitioner filed with the court, as required by § 512(h)(2), notifications that it provided to
25
Borjan Solutions, an internet service provider, through a removal form installed on its website. See
26
ECF No. 1, pgs 30-38. Petitioner also attached a declaration of Adam Silverman, a managing
27
member of AMA, stating that the purpose of the subpoena is to identify alleged infringers and such
28
information will only be used for the purposes of protecting AMA’s rights under 17 U.S.C. § 100.
1
Petitioner represents that it attached a proposed subpoena to the manually filed motion and the Clerk
2
of the Court executed the proposed subpoena. Subsequently, Petitioner served the subpoena upon
3
the recipient, who then responded. See Motion to Vacate Order (ECF No. 4), Exhibits 2, 3.
4
Petitioner’s Request for Issuance of Subpoena (ECF No. 1) is, therefore, granted. Further, the Court
5
grants Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate Order and instructs the Clerk of the Court to vacate the Order
6
(ECF No. 3) as moot. Accordingly,
7
8
9
10
11
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s Request for Issuance of Subpoena (ECF No.
1) and Motion to Vacate Order (ECF No. 4) are granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall vacate the Order (ECF No.
3), issued on September 27, 2017.
DATED this 2nd day of October, 2017.
12
13
14
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?