Lawrence et al v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al

Filing 41

ORDER Denying without prejudice Plaintiffs' 38 , 39 , and 40 Motions to Appoint Guardian ad Litem. Any renewed motions to appear as guardian ad litem shall be filed by 1/5/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 12/26/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 JACQUELINE LAWRENCE, et al., ) ) Plaintiff(s), ) ) v. ) ) LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE ) DEPARTMENT, et al., ) ) Defendant(s). ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:16-cv-03039-JCM-NJK ORDER (Docket Nos. 38, 39, 40) 16 Pending before the Court are the motions of Araceli Saenz, Carolina Navarro, and Amber Neubert 17 to appear as guardian ad litems for Plaintiffs A.S, K.C., and K.C., respectively. Docket Nos. 38, 39, 40. 18 The motions fail to include points and authorities in support of the relief sought,1 or any meaningfully 19 developed arguments. Id. Additionally, Docket No. 40 includes the full name of the minor child. Docket 20 No. 40 at 2. Pursuant to Local Rule IC 6-1(2), only the initials of minor children should be used in 21 documents filed with the Court. 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 28 1 United States Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen recently outlined pertinent standards and legal authority. See A.R.N.H. v. Colvin, 2017 U.S. Dist. Lexis 37166, at *1-3 (D. Nev. Mar. 15, 2017). 1 Accordingly, all three motions are DENIED without prejudice. See Local Rule 7-2(d); see also Kor 2 Media Group, LLC v. Green, 294 F.R.D. 579, 582 n.3 (D. Nev. 2013). Any renewed motions to appear as 3 guardian ad litem shall be filed by January 5, 2018. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: December 26, 2017 6 7 ________________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?