Lawrence et al v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al

Filing 47

ORDER Denying 42 - 44 Motions to Appoint Guardian ad Litem as unnecessary and STRICKEN for violating the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/8/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 JACQUELINE LAWRENCE, et al., 11 Plaintiff(s), 12 v. 13 LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 14 Defendant(s). 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:16-cv-03039-JCM-NJK ORDER (Docket Nos. 42-44) 16 Pending before the Court are petitions for appointment of guardian ad litem, Docket Nos. 42-44, 17 which appear unnecessary in light of the subsequent motion for appointment of guardian ad litem. 18 Docket No. 45.1 Moreover, in violation of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules, 19 counsel has filed on the public docket the birth dates of the minors in each petition. Compare, e.g., 20 Docket No. 42 at 2 with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a)(2) (redaction required for birth dates except as to the year 21 of birth), Local Rule IC 6-1(a)(3) (same). 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 27 28 1 The Court expresses no opinion herein as to the motion for appointment of guardians ad litem at Docket No. 45. 1 Accordingly, the petitions at Docket Nos. 42-44 are DENIED as unnecessary and STRICKEN 2 for violating the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules. To the extent the petitions were 3 intended to serve as factual support for the motion, they shall be refiled as declarations. Counsel shall 4 strictly comply with the redaction requirements for personal identifiers moving forward. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 DATED: January 8, 2018 7 _____________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?