Falls et al v. Desert Palace, Inc

Filing 36

ORDER Granting 34 Stipulation re Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d). Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/17/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Case 2:17-cv-00019-GMN-PAL Document 34 Filed 10/06/17 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

SCOTT M. MAHONEY (Nev. Bar No. 1099)
FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP
300 S. Fourth Street, Suite 1500
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]
DONALD R. LIVINGSTON (DC Bar No. 436063)
ESTHER G. LANDER (DC Bar No. 461316)
Admitted pro hac vice
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
DESERT PALACE, INC., d/b/a CAESARS PALACE
KATHLEEN J. ENGLAND
GILBERT & ENGLAND LAW FIRM
610 South Ninth Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiffs
WILLIAM J. BERRY, JR.; CYNTHIA FALLS; and
SHANE KAUFMAN

17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

20

22

WILLIAM J. BERRY, JR.;
CYNTHIA FALLS; and SHANE
KAUFMAN,

23

Plaintiffs,

24

v.

25

DESERT PALACE, INC., d/b/a
CAESARS PALACE; DOES I
through X, and ROE BUSINESS
ENTITIES I through X, inclusive,

21

26
27
28

Defendants.

Case No. 2:17-cv-00019-GMN-PAL
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:
FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE
502(d)

Case 2:17-cv-00019-GMN-PAL Document 34 Filed 10/06/17 Page 2 of 3

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs

2

WILLIAM J. BERRY, JR., CYNTHIA FALLS, and SHANE KAUFMANN and

3

Defendant DESERT PALACE, INC., d/b/a CAESARS PALACE, by and through

4

their respective counsel of record, as follows:

5

1.

The production of privileged or work-product protected

6

documents, ESI or information, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not a waiver of

7

the privilege or protection from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state

8

proceeding. This Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection

9

allowed by Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d).

10

2.

Nothing contained herein is intended to or shall serve to limit a

11

party’s right to conduct a review of documents, ESI or information (including

12

metadata) for relevance, responsiveness and/or segregation of privileged and/or

13

protected information before production.

14
15

Dated: October 6, 2017

Dated: October 6, 2017

16

By: ________/s/________________
SCOTT M. MAHONEY
Fisher & Phillips LLP
300 S. Fourth Street, Suite 1500
Las Vegas, NV 89101

By: /s/ Kathleen J. England
KATHLEEN J. ENGLAND
Gilbert & England Law Firm
610 South Ninth Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101

17
18
19
20
21
22
23

DONALD R. LIVINGSTON
ESTHER G. LANDER
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036
Attorneys for Defendant,
Desert Palace, Inc., d/b/a
Caesars Palace

IT IS SO ORDERED:

24

____________________________
United States Magistrate Judge

25
26

October 17, 2017
Dated: ____________________

27
28

Attorney for Plaintiffs,
William J. Berry, Jr., Cynthia
Falls, and Shane Kaufmann

2