Falls et al v. Desert Palace, Inc

Filing 83

ORDER Granting 81 Third Stipulation to Extend Deadlines. Discovery due by 10/21/2018. Motions due by 11/30/2018. Joint Pretrial Order: date is unchanged. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/10/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-00019-GMN-PAL Document 81 Filed 08/02/18 Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 PATRICK H. HICKS (Nev. Bar No. 4832) LITTLER MENDELSON P.C. 3960 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 300 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: (702) 862-8800 phicks@littler.com 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 SCOTT M. MAHONEY (Nev. Bar No. 1099) FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP 300 S. Fourth Street, Suite 1500 Las Vegas, NV 89101 Telephone: (702) 252-3131 smahoney@fisherphillips.com ESTHER G. LANDER (DC Bar No. 461316) Admitted pro hac vice AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: (202) 887-4000 elander@akingump.com WILLIAM J. EDELMAN (CA Bar No. 285177) Admitted pro hac vice AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 580 California Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 765-9532 wedelman@akingump.com Attorneys for Defendant DESERT PALACE, INC., d/b/a CAESARS PALACE 17 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 19 20 21 22 23 24 WILLIAM J. BERRY, JR.; CYNTHIA FALLS; and SHANE KAUFMANN, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 2:17-cv-00019-GMN-PAL DESERT PALACE, INC., d/b/a CAESARS PALACE; DOES I through X, and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through X, inclusive, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINES (Third Request) 25 Defendants. 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs WILLIAM J. BERRY, JR., CYNTHIA FALLS, and SHANE KAUFMANN and Defendant DESERT Case 2:17-cv-00019-GMN-PAL Document 81 Filed 08/02/18 Page 2 of 5 1 PALACE, INC., d/b/a CAESARS PALACE (“Caesars”), by and through their respective counsel 2 of record, that (i) the deadline for completion of depositions be extended from the current 3 discovery cutoff date of August 24, 2018, to October 21, 2018; (ii) the deadline for written 4 discovery related to new information disclosed during the depositions of Maggie Gong, Dan 5 Burdalski, and Kim Williams, be extended from July 25, 2018, to August 16, 2018; and the 6 dispositive motion deadline be extended from September 24, 2018, to November 30, 2018. This 7 is the parties’ third stipulation to extend discovery deadlines. The parties state as follows: 8 9 10 11 12 13 DISCOVERY COMPLETED 1. Plaintiffs filed suit on January 3, 2017 (ECF No. 1). 2. Discovery has twice been stayed while the parties attended mediation sessions on October 31, 2017 (ECF No. 45) and May 8, 2018 (ECF No. 73). 3. To date, as a group, plaintiffs William J. Berry, Jr., Shane Kaufmann, and Cynthia Falls have: 14 (i) Made initial disclosures on or about May 24, 2017; 15 (ii) Propounded 14 sets of requests for production (RFP) of documents, totaling 16 99 individual requests; 17 (iii) Propounded 3 sets of interrogatories, totaling 59 individual interrogatories; 18 (iv) Noticed the depositions of 3 individuals and Caesars’ corporate 19 representative on two subjects. Following a meet and confer regarding 20 scheduling, the depositions are scheduled for, August 2, 2-18 (30(b)(6)), 21 August 3, 2018 (Kim Williams), August 8, 2018 (Maggie Gong), and August 22 9, 2018 (Dan Burdalski). 23 24 25 26 27 4. To date, Caesars has: (i) Made initial disclosures on or about May 26, 2017, and supplemented those disclosures in April and July 2018; (ii) Propounded 6 sets of requests for production (RFP) of documents, totaling 88 individual requests; 28 2 Case 2:17-cv-00019-GMN-PAL Document 81 Filed 08/02/18 Page 3 of 5 1 (iii) Propounded 3 sets of interrogatories, totaling 40 individual interrogatories; 2 and (iv) Deposed the three plaintiffs.1 3 4 5. Caesars has produced 25,747 pages of documents and responsive video files. 5 6. Plaintiffs have produced 2,576 pages of documents and one audio record. 6 DISCOVERY REMAINING 7 8 7. The parties agree that an extension of the discovery deadline to October 21, 2018, to 9 complete depositions is appropriate. Caesars reserves its right to object to depositions exceeding 10 the ten provided for under Rule 30(a)(2). 11 8. The parties agree that plaintiffs should have an opportunity to propound written discovery 12 related to new information disclosed during the depositions of Maggie Gong, Dan Burdalski, and 13 Kim Williams, though Caesars reserves all objections to the substance of such discovery requests. 14 9. Plaintiffs reserve their right to seek relief from the Court for additional discovery beyond 15 what Caesars has agreed to in this stipulation. 16 JUSTIFICATION 17 18 10. Plaintiffs began noticing the pending depositions between June 28, 2018, and July 3, 19 2018. The parties met and conferred in good faith regarding scheduling. In light of plaintiffs’ 20 counsel’s accommodations of the deponents’ scheduling conflicts, and in light of plaintiffs’ 21 counsel’s unexpected family medical issues which will require additional flexibility and absence 22 in August (when discovery is scheduled to end on August 24), the parties agree that a brief 23 extension to October 21, 2018, to complete depositions is appropriate. The parties also agree that 24 written discovery related to new information disclosed during the depositions of Maggie Gong, 25 Dan Burdalski, and Kim Williams, which could have been served in advance of the currently- 26 27 28 1 The depositions of plaintiffs Kaufmann and Falls are not yet completed. Caesars completed its direct examination of each plaintiff, and plaintiff’s counsel began questioning each, but did not finish. The parties continue to discuss continuation of those depositions. 3 Case 2:17-cv-00019-GMN-PAL Document 81 Filed 08/02/18 Page 4 of 5 1 scheduled discovery cutoff absent accommodation of the deponents’ scheduling conflicts, is 2 appropriate. 3 PROPOSED SCHEDULE 4 11. Scheduled Event 5 Current Deadline Proposed NEW Deadline August 24, 2018 October 21, 2018 July 25, 2018 August 16, 2018 6 Completion of depositions 7 10 Service of written discovery related to new information disclosed during the depositions of Maggie Gong, Dan Burdalski, and Kim Williams 11 Dispositive Motions September 24, 2018 November 30, 2018 Joint Pretrial Order 30 days after dispositive motion deadline if no dispositive motions filed, or 30 days after decision on any dispositive motion(s) Unchanged 8 9 12 13 14 15 16 17 12. This stipulation is made in good faith to allow the parties to continue to make diligent and 18 19 sincere efforts to complete discovery and is not for the purpose of causing any undue delay, and 20 the parties agree that good cause therefor exists for the stipulated extensions. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 21 22 Dated: August 1, 2018 Dated: August 1, 2018 23 By: /s/Patrick H. Hicks PATRICK H. HICKS Littler Mendelsohn P.C. 3960 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 300 Las Vegas, NV 89169 By: /s/ Kathleen J. England KATHLEEN J. ENGLAND Gilbert & England Law Firm 610 South Ninth Street Las Vegas, NV 89101 ESTHER G. LANDER Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W Washington, D.C. 20036 JASON R. MAIER DANIELLE J. BARRAZA Maier Gutierrez & Associates 8816 Spanish Ridge Avenue Las Vegas, NV 89148 24 25 26 27 28 4 Case 2:17-cv-00019-GMN-PAL Document 81 Filed 08/02/18 Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 WILLIAM J. EDELMAN Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP 580 California Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, CA 94104 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, William J. Berry, Jr., Cynthia Falls, and Shane Kaufmann SCOTT M. MAHONEY Fisher & Phillips LLP 300 S. Fourth Street, Suite 1500 Las Vegas, NV 89101 6 7 8 Attorneys for Defendant, Desert Palace, Inc., d/b/a Caesars Palace 9 IT IS SO ORDERED: 10 ____________________________ United States Magistrate Judge 11 August 10, 2018 Dated: __________________ 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?