Carrington v. Santander Consumer U.S.A., Inc. et al

Filing 39

ORDER Granting 28 Stipulation to Extend Time re 26 Motion to Dismiss. See Order for deadlines. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 12/20/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1
2
3
4
5

J Christopher Jorgensen
Nevada Bar No. 5382
LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP
3993 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Suite 600
Las Vegas, NV 89169-5996
Tel: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.

6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8
9

KENDRA M. CARRINGTON,
Plaintiff,

10
3993 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Suite 600
Las Vegas, NV 89169-5996

11

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO
RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS

v.

SANTANDER CONSUMER U.S.A, INC.
12 and EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SERVICES, INC.,
13
Defendants.
14
15

Case No.: 2:17-CV-00038-KJD-NJK

(SECOND REQUEST)

Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, and IA 6-2, the parties, by and through their attorneys

16 of record hereby stipulate and request the court grant additional time for Plaintiff to respond to
17 the Motion to Dismiss filed by Santander Consumer U.S.A. Inc. (“Defendant”).
18

1.

Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss on October 26, 2017 (ECF No. 26). The

19 introduction section in the body of the Motion to Dismiss advises that the Motion is made and
20 based on FRCP 12(b)(6), 12(c) and 56(c). The Court automatically scheduled Plaintiff’s
21 Response for the Motion to Dismiss for November 9, 2017.
22

2.

The parties previously stipulated and agreed to a one (1) week extension to

23 extend the Plaintiff’s time to file a Response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss from November
24 9, 2017 to November 16, 2017 (ECF No 27, ruling still pending). Upon further review of the
25 Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff has requested, and Santander has agreed to, an additional one week
26 extension of the deadline for Plaintiff’s Response to the Motion to Dismiss, i.e., from November
27 16, 2017 to November 24, 2017.
28

3.
102852385_1

The parties now agree to a second one-week extension for Plaintiff to file a

1 responsive pleading to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, from November 16, 2017 to November
2 24, 2017. Good cause exists for this request.
3

4.

The extension is requested by the Plaintiff to allow her counsel sufficient time

4 to review Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and to compile evidence to and respond to the Rule
5 56(c) portions of the Motion to Dismiss. This stipulation is not made for purposes of delay.
6

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

7

DATED this 17th day of November, 2017

DATED this 17th day of November, 2017

8

THE LAW OFFICE OF VERNON NELSON

LEWIS ROCA
ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP

By: /s/ Vernon Nelson_________________
Vernon Nelson
9480 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 252
Las Vegas, NV 89123
Tele: 702-476-2500
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff
KENDRA M. CARRINGTON

By:/s/ J. Christopher Jorgensen________
J Christopher Jorgensen
3993 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Ste. 600
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Tele: 702-949-8200
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
SANTANDER CONSUMER, USA INC

9
10
3993 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Suite 600
Las Vegas, NV 89169-5996

11
12
13
14
15
16

ORDER

17

IT IS SO ORDERED.

18
____________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

19
20

12/20/2017
DATED: ____________________________
nunc pro
tunc

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

102852385_1

2