McCart-Pollak v. Etkin et al

Filing 59

ORDER denying 50 Motion to Clarify.; denying 53 Motion for Hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 11/7/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
4
5
SHANA LEE MCCART-POLLAK,

10

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

11

Presently before the court is Plaintiff Shana Lee McCart-Pollack’s Request to Clarify Joint

6
Plaintiff,
7
vs.
8
EDWARD ETKIN,
9
Defendant.

Case No. 2:17-cv-00042-RFB-CWH
ORDER

12

Pretrial Order Due Date (ECF No. 50), filed on October 13, 2017. Defendant Edward Etkin filed a

13

response (ECF No. 51) on October 17, 2017. The court entered an order (ECF No. 47) stating that

14

the joint pretrial order is due on November 24, 2017, or thirty days after the court’s order deciding

15

the last pending dispositive motion. Thus, Plaintiff’s request for clarification is moot.

16

Also before the court is Plaintiff’s request for a hearing (ECF No. 53), filed on October 20,

17

2017. Defendant did not file a response. Plaintiff requests that the court set a hearing on her motion

18

to compel (ECF No. 32) and her motion for sanctions (ECF No. 41). A hearing on those motions,

19

and various other pending motions, is set for December 8, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3C.

20

(Min. Order (ECF No. 58).) Thus, Plaintiff’s request for a hearing is moot.

21
22
23
24

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff Shana Lee McCart-Pollack’s Request to
Clarify Joint Pretrial Order Due Date (ECF No. 50) is DENIED as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request for a hearing (ECF No. 53) is DENIED
as moot.

25
DATED: November 7, 2017
26
27
28

______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge