Jeffrey Morse v. Ten X Holdings, LLC et al
Filing
40
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 38 Plaintiff Jeffrey Morse's Renewed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Effectuate Service of Brian Pebley is GRANTED. Plaintiff's deadline to serve Defendant Brian Pebley is 8/17/17. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 39 Plaintiff's Motion to Serve Defendant Brian Pebley by Publication is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 5/19/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
7
8
9
10
JEFFREY MORSE,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
TEN X HOLDINGS, LLC, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:17-cv-00073-JAD-CWH
ORDER
11
12
13
14
15
16
Presently before the court is Plaintiff Jeffrey Morse’s Renewed Motion for Enlargement of
Time to Effectuate Service of Brian Pebley (ECF No. 38), filed on May 15, 2017.
Also before the court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Serve Defendant Brian Pebley by Publication
(ECF No. 39), filed on May 15, 2017.
The court has read and considered the motions and finds that Plaintiff has exercised due
17
diligence in attempting to personally serve Defendant Pebley. The court further finds that there is
18
good cause to extend time to serve Defendant Pebley. The court therefore will grant Plaintiff an
19
additional 90 days to serve Defendant Pebley by publication under Rule 4(e)(1) of the Federal
20
Rules of Civil Procedure and under Rule 4(e)(1)(I) of the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure.
21
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff Jeffrey Morse’s Renewed Motion for
22
Enlargement of Time to Effectuate Service of Brian Pebley (ECF No. 38) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s
23
deadline to serve Defendant Brian Pebley is August 17, 2017.
24
25
26
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Serve Defendant Brian Pebley by
Publication (ECF No. 39) is GRANTED.
DATED: May 19, 2017
27
28
______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?