JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al
Filing
30
ORDER Granting 27 Motion for Service by Publication. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 28 Motion to Enlarge Time to Serve is Granted and the time for service is extended by an additional 60 days from the date of this order is entered to allow SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (SFR) to effectuate service by publication. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/13/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Case 2:17-cv-00074-JCM-PAL Document 29 Filed 07/11/17 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
DIANA CLINE EBRON, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10580
E-mail: diana@KGElegal.com
JACQUELINE A. GILBERT, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10593
E-mail: jackie@KGElegal.com
KAREN L. HANKS, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9578
E-mail: karen@KGElegal.com
KIM GILBERT EBRON
7625 Dean Martin Drive, Suite 110
Las Vegas, Nevada 89139
Telephone: (702) 485-3300
Facsimile: (702) 485-3301
Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
(702) 485-3300 FAX (702) 485-3301
KIM GILBERT EBRON
7625 DEAN MARTIN DRIVE, SUITE 110
LAS VEGAS, NV 89139
11
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., a national
banking association,
13
Plaintiff,
14
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SERVE
FIDEL H. PAJARILLO BY PUBLICATION
vs.
15
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, a
Nevada limited liability company; RANCHO
LAS BRISAS MASTER HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION, a Nevada non-profit
corporation; FIDEL H. PAJARILLO, an
individual,
16
17
18
19
20
Case No. 2:17-cv-00074-JCM-PAL
-andORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
ENLARGE TIME TO SERVE SUMMONS
AND CROSS-CLAIM
Defendants.
______________________________________
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, a
Nevada limited liability company,
21
Counter/Cross Claimant,
22
23
24
25
26
vs.
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., a national
banking association; FIDEL H. PAJARILLO,
an individual,
Counter/Cross Defendants.
27
Upon reading the Affidavit of Due Diligence; it appearing that an Answer, Counterclaim,
28
and Cross-Claim has been filed; that a Summons directed to Cross-Defendant, FIDEL H.
-1-
Case 2:17-cv-00074-JCM-PAL Document 29 Filed 07/11/17 Page 2 of 3
1
PAJARILLO has been issued [ECF No. 24]; that Cross-Defendant, Pajarillo is a necessary party;
2
and that Cross-Defendant Pajarillo cannot be found to be personally served in the State of Nevada,
3
and good cause appearing therefore,
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that since the Cross-Defendant, FIDEL H. PAJARILLO,
5
cannot now be found so as to be personally served, he may be served by publication of the
6
Summons at least once a week for four (4) weeks in the Nevada Legal News, a newspaper of
7
general circulation.
8
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of the Summons and Answer, Counterclaim,
9
and Cross-Claim shall be mailed forthwith to Cross-Defendant Pajarillo, first class mail, postage
10
prepaid, addressed to the Cross-Defendant’s last known address.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that SFR’s Motion to Enlarge Time to Serve is GRANTED
12
(702) 485-3300 FAX (702) 485-3301
KIM GILBERT EBRON
7625 DEAN MARTIN DRIVE, SUITE 110
LAS VEGAS, NV 89139
11
and the time for service is extended by an additional 60 days from the date of this order is entered
13
///
14
///
15
///
16
///
17
///
18
///
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
-2-
Case 2:17-cv-00074-JCM-PAL Document 29 Filed 07/11/17 Page 3 of 3
1
to allow SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (“SFR”) to effectuate service by publication.
2
3
Dated this 13th day of July, 2017.
4
5
___________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
Submitted by:
8
KIM GILBERT EBRON
9
/s/Diana Cline Ebron
Diana Cline Ebron, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10580
Jacqueline A. Gilbert, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10593
Karen L. Hanks, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9578
7625 Dean Martin Drive, Suite 110
Las Vegas, Nevada 89139
Phone: (702) 485-3300
Fax: (702) 485-3301
Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC
10
12
(702) 485-3300 FAX (702) 485-3301
KIM GILBERT EBRON
7625 DEAN MARTIN DRIVE, SUITE 110
LAS VEGAS, NV 89139
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?