Bart Street III v. ACC Enterprises, LLC et al

Filing 133

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any opposition to 132 Plaintiff's Motion to Stay All Discovery and Pretrial Deadlines Until the District Court Rules Upon Plaintiffs Pending Dispositive Motion must be filed on or before noon, 9/29/17. No rep ly necessary. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing on 132 Plaintiff's Motion to Stay All Discovery and Pretrial Deadlines Until the District Court Rules Upon Plaintiffs Pending Dispositive Motion is scheduled for 10:00 AM, 10/2/17, in Courtroom 3D. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff must provide to chambers by noon, 9/28/17, documents as detailed in Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 9/26/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 5 6 BART STREET III, a Nebraska Limited Liability Company, 7 8 9 10 Plaintiff, 2:17-cv-00083-GMN-VCF ORDER vs. ACC ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company, ACC INDUSTRIES, INC., a Nevada corporation; CALVADA PARTNERS, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company, 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay All Discovery and Pretrial Deadlines Until the District Court Rules Upon Plaintiff’s Pending Dispositive Motion (ECF No. 132). 15 Accordingly, 16 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay All Discovery and 17 Pretrial Deadlines Until the District Court Rules Upon Plaintiff’s Pending Dispositive Motion (ECF No. 18 132) must be filed on or before noon, September 29, 2017. No reply necessary. 19 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay All Discovery and 20 Pretrial Deadlines Until the District Court Rules Upon Plaintiff’s Pending Dispositive Motion (ECF No. 21 132) is scheduled for 10:00 AM, October 2, 2017, in Courtroom 3D. 22 Pursuant to LR IC 2-2(g), unless the presiding judge orders otherwise, a filer must provide to 23 chambers a paper copy of all electronically filed documents that exceed 50 pages in length, including 24 exhibits or attachments. Paper copies must be appropriately tabbed as stated in LR IA 10-3(i). 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff must provide to chambers by noon, September 28, 2017, in the form required by this Court’s local rules, courtesy copies of the following: 1. Appendix in support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Emergency Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoenas – Volume 1 (ECF No. 106), 2. Appendix in support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Emergency Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoenas – Volume 2 (ECF No. 107), 3. Appendix in support of Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Responses to Written Discovery – Volume 1 (ECF No. 112), 4. Appendix in support of Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Responses to Written Discovery – Volume 2 (ECF No. 113), 5. Appendix in support of Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Responses to Written Discovery – Volume 3 (ECF No. 114), 6. Appendix in support of Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents Responsive to Subpoenas Duces Tecum (ECF No. 121), and, 7. Appendix in support of Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents Responsive to Subpoenas Duces Tecum, Volume 2 (ECF No. 122). 17 In the alternative, if by filing the motion to stay all discovery Plaintiff is abandoning its positions 18 in Plaintiff’s motion to compel responses to written discovery (ECF No. 111), Plaintiff’s motion to compel 19 production of documents (ECF No. 120), and Defendant’s Motion to Quash (ECF No. 101), then Plaintiff 20 must file, by noon, September 28, 2017, a notice withdrawing motions numbered 111 and 120, and 21 consenting to the granting of motion 101. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 DATED this 26th day of September, 2017. 24 25 _________________________ CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?