Hunt v. Zuffa, LLC et al

Filing 102

ORDER Granting 101 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 99 Order (First Request). Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 1/5/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 12/22/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-00085-JAD-CWH Document 101 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 CHRISTINA M. DENNING, ESQ. (CA Bar No. 211137) denningc@higgslaw.com SCOTT J. INGOLD, ESQ. (NV Bar No. 11818) ingolds@higgslaw.com JOSEPH A. GONNELLA, ESQ. (CA Bar No. 306619) Higgs Fletcher & Mack LLP 401 West “A” Street, Suite 2600 San Diego, CA 92101-7913 T: 619.236.1551 F: 619.696.1410 JAMES F. HOLTZ, ESQ. (NV Bar No. 8119) james.holtz@holtzapc.com LAW OFFICE OF JAMES F. HOLTZ 1120 Town Center Drive, Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89144 T: 702.304.1803 F: 702.304.1822 Attorneys for Plaintiff MARK HUNT 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 17 18 19 MARK HUNT, an individual, Plaintiff, v. 20 21 22 23 24 ZUFFA, LLC d/b/a ULTIMATE FIGHTING CHAMPIONSHIP, a Nevada limited liability company; BROCK LESNAR, an individual; DANA WHITE, an individual; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 25 Case No.: 2:17-cv-00085-JAD-CWH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE STIPULATED DISCOVERY PLAN AND PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER [FIRST REQUEST FOR EXTENSION] Defendants. 26 27 28 Pursuant to this Court’s order and consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 26 and Local Rule 26-1, the parties’ stipulated discovery plan and Case No.: 2:17-cv-00085-JAD-CWH H IGGS F LE TCHER & M ACK LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN DIEGO 112567-00001 8289057.1 Case 2:17-cv-00085-JAD-CWH Document 101 Filed 12/21/17 Page 2 of 4 1 proposed scheduling order is to be filed by December 26, 2017. Plaintiff MARK HUNT 2 (“Hunt”), and Defendants ZUFFA, LLC d/b/a ULTIMATE FIGHTING 3 CHAMPIONSHIP (“Zuffa”), DANA WHITE (“White”) and BROCK LESNAR 4 (“Lesnar”) hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for parties to file the stipulated 5 discovery plan and proposed scheduling order for ten (10) days, until January 5, 2018. 6 This stipulation is based on the following: 7 Defendants Lesnar, Zuffa, and White have pending motions to dismiss before the 8 Court. Hunt filed a motion for leave to file a supplemental complaint on December 15, 9 2017. (ECF No. 100.) Counsel for all parties have conferred via e-mail regarding the 10 stipulated discovery plan and proposed scheduling order. This action will involve a high 11 volume of documents and electronic information. Counsel for Zuffa has advised it will 12 seek a stipulated protective order; Hunt and Lesnar will negotiate in good faith to reach 13 mutually agreeable stipulated protective order. The Court’s order on Lesnar’s motion to 14 stay discovery, consistent with Hunt’s agreement to stay RICO-related discovery, ordered 15 that discovery will be stayed as to Hunt’s first and second claims, but shall otherwise 16 proceed on all other claims. 17 Counsel for all parties intend to meet telephonically to discuss a discovery plan, 18 scheduling, and case-specific issues regarding a stipulated protective order and 19 consideration of crafting a discovery plan subject to the partial discovery stay. The parties 20 request a brief extension to permit lead counsel for all parties to participate in the 21 telephonic conference of counsel, and submit this will facilitate reaching potential 22 discovery agreements and stipulations consistent with F.R.C.P. 26 and LR 26-1. The 23 parties have been unable to coordinate a mutually convenient time for lead counsel to 24 participate in the telephonic conference prior to the Christmas holiday due to calendaring 25 conflicts with other matters and pre-existing travel obligations. The stipulated discovery 26 plan and proposed scheduling order is currently due on December 26, 2017. This is the 27 first request for an extension of time. 28 H IGGS F LE TCHER & M ACK LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN DIEGO 112567-00001 8289057.1 2 Case No.: 2:17-cv-00085--JAD-CWH Case 2:17-cv-00085-JAD-CWH Document 101 Filed 12/21/17 Page 3 of 4 1 Based on the foregoing, good cause exists and the parties hereby stipulate and 2 request that the Court issue an Order extending the deadline to file the stipulated 3 discovery plan and proposed scheduling order ten (10) days to January 5, 2018. 4 5 DATED: December 21, 2017 HIGGS FLETCHER & MACK LLP By: /s/ Joseph A. Gonnella CHRISTINA M. DENNING, ESQ. SCOTT J. INGOLD, ESQ. JOSEPH A. GONNELLA, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff MARK HUNT 6 7 8 9 10 DATED: December 21, 2017 CAMPBELL & WILLIAMS 11 By: /s/ Philip R. Erwin J. COLBY WILLIAMS, ESQ. PHILIP R. ERWIN, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendants ZUFFA, LLC d/b/a ULTIMATE FIGHTING CHAMPIONSHIP and DANA WHITE 12 13 14 15 16 DATED: December 21, 2017 CHRISTIANSEN LAW OFFICES 17 By: /s/ Howard Jacobs HOWARD JACOBS, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendants BROCK LESNAR 18 19 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED: 22 BY: ____________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 24 December 22, 2017 25 DATED: ____________________________ 26 27 28 H IGGS F LE TCHER & M ACK LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN DIEGO 112567-00001 8289057.1 3 Case No.: 2:17-cv-00085--JAD-CWH Case 2:17-cv-00085-JAD-CWH Document 101 Filed 12/21/17 Page 4 of 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5 and the Court’s Local Rules, the 3 undersigned hereby certifies that on this day, December 21, 2017, a copy of the 4 foregoing document entitled STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: 5 EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE STIPULATED DISCOVERY PLAN AND 6 PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER was filed and served through the Court’s 7 electronic filing system (CM/ECF) upon all registered parties and their counsel. 8 9 10 11 Barbara Lodovice An employee of Higgs Fletcher & Mack LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 H IGGS F LE TCHER & M ACK LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN DIEGO 112567-00001 8289057.1 4 Case No.: 2:17-cv-00085--JAD-CWH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?