Hunt v. Zuffa, LLC et al
Filing
35
ORDER Granting 34 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 11 Motion to Dismiss. Replies due by 4/7/2017. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/30/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
Case 2:17-cv-00085-JAD-CWH Document 34 Filed 03/30/17 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
CAMPBELL & WILLIAMS
DONALD J. CAMPBELL, ESQ. (1216)
djc@cwlawlv.com
J. COLBY WILLIAMS, ESQ. (5549)
jcw@cwlawlv.com
700 South Seventh Street
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone: (702) 382-5222
Facsimile: (702) 382-0540
Attorneys for Defendants
Zuffa, LLC and Dana White
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
MARK HUNT, an individual,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
vs.
14
ZUFFA, LLC d/b/a ULTIMATE FIGHTING
CHAMPIONSHIP, a Nevada limited liability
Company; BROCK LESNAR, an individual;
and DANA WHITE, an individual; and DOES
1-50, inclusive,
15
16
17
18
Defendants.
_______________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:17-cv-00085-JAD-CWH
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS ZUFFA, LLC AND
DANA WHITE TO FILE REPLY IN
SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
(First Request)
19
Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, 6-2 and LR 7-1, the undersigned counsel of record for
20
Plaintiff Mark Hunt and Defendants Zuffa, LLC and Dana White hereby STIPULATE to extend
21
the time for these Defendants to file a combined Reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss
22
(ECF No. 11) (the “Motion”). Defendants filed their Motion on February 28, 2017; Plaintiff
23
24
25
26
filed his Opposition to the Motion (ECF No. 19) on March 21, 2017; and the Court set this
matter for hearing on May 15, 2017 (ECF No. 13). Defendants’ Reply is currently due on March
31, 2017. If approved, the forgoing parties have agreed to a one-week extension to file the
27
28
Page 1 of 3
Case 2:17-cv-00085-JAD-CWH Document 34 Filed 03/30/17 Page 2 of 3
1
2
Reply, which would make it due on April 7, 2017. This is the first stipulation seeking to extend
the Reply deadline.
3
Defendants submit that good cause exists to approve the requested stipulation as their lead
4
counsel with responsibility for drafting the Reply will be out of the jurisdiction at the end of this
5
week on another matter, and will not return to the office until Tuesday, April 4, 2017. Granting
6
7
8
9
10
11
the requested one-week extension will provide Defendants with sufficient time to address the
numerous arguments raised in the Opposition without the necessity of altering the existing oral
argument date, which will still be more than one month away even after accounting for the
proposed new Reply date.
DATED: March 30, 2017
Respectfully submitted,
12
CAMPBELL & WILLIAMS
13
By___/s/ J. Colby Williams_____________
J. COLBY WILLIAMS, ESQ. (#5549)
700 South Seventh Street
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
14
15
16
17
Attorneys for Defendants
Zuffa, LLC and Dana White
18
HIGGS FLETCHER & MACK LLP
19
By__/s/ Scott J. Ingold________________________
SCOTT J. INGOLD, ESQ. (Nev. Bar No. 11818)
401 West “A” Street, Suite 2600
San Diego, California 92101
20
21
22
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Mark Hunt
23
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED:
26
By___________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
March 30, 2017
Dated:________________________________
28
Page 2 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?