Hunt v. Zuffa, LLC et al

Filing 35

ORDER Granting 34 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 11 Motion to Dismiss. Replies due by 4/7/2017. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/30/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-00085-JAD-CWH Document 34 Filed 03/30/17 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 CAMPBELL & WILLIAMS DONALD J. CAMPBELL, ESQ. (1216) djc@cwlawlv.com J. COLBY WILLIAMS, ESQ. (5549) jcw@cwlawlv.com 700 South Seventh Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 382-5222 Facsimile: (702) 382-0540 Attorneys for Defendants Zuffa, LLC and Dana White 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 MARK HUNT, an individual, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 vs. 14 ZUFFA, LLC d/b/a ULTIMATE FIGHTING CHAMPIONSHIP, a Nevada limited liability Company; BROCK LESNAR, an individual; and DANA WHITE, an individual; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 15 16 17 18 Defendants. _______________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:17-cv-00085-JAD-CWH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS ZUFFA, LLC AND DANA WHITE TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS (First Request) 19 Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, 6-2 and LR 7-1, the undersigned counsel of record for 20 Plaintiff Mark Hunt and Defendants Zuffa, LLC and Dana White hereby STIPULATE to extend 21 the time for these Defendants to file a combined Reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss 22 (ECF No. 11) (the “Motion”). Defendants filed their Motion on February 28, 2017; Plaintiff 23 24 25 26 filed his Opposition to the Motion (ECF No. 19) on March 21, 2017; and the Court set this matter for hearing on May 15, 2017 (ECF No. 13). Defendants’ Reply is currently due on March 31, 2017. If approved, the forgoing parties have agreed to a one-week extension to file the 27 28 Page 1 of 3 Case 2:17-cv-00085-JAD-CWH Document 34 Filed 03/30/17 Page 2 of 3 1 2 Reply, which would make it due on April 7, 2017. This is the first stipulation seeking to extend the Reply deadline. 3 Defendants submit that good cause exists to approve the requested stipulation as their lead 4 counsel with responsibility for drafting the Reply will be out of the jurisdiction at the end of this 5 week on another matter, and will not return to the office until Tuesday, April 4, 2017. Granting 6 7 8 9 10 11 the requested one-week extension will provide Defendants with sufficient time to address the numerous arguments raised in the Opposition without the necessity of altering the existing oral argument date, which will still be more than one month away even after accounting for the proposed new Reply date. DATED: March 30, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 12 CAMPBELL & WILLIAMS 13 By___/s/ J. Colby Williams_____________ J. COLBY WILLIAMS, ESQ. (#5549) 700 South Seventh Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 14 15 16 17 Attorneys for Defendants Zuffa, LLC and Dana White 18 HIGGS FLETCHER & MACK LLP 19 By__/s/ Scott J. Ingold________________________ SCOTT J. INGOLD, ESQ. (Nev. Bar No. 11818) 401 West “A” Street, Suite 2600 San Diego, California 92101 20 21 22 Attorneys for Plaintiff Mark Hunt 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED: 26 By___________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 March 30, 2017 Dated:________________________________ 28 Page 2 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?