Hunt v. Zuffa, LLC et al

Filing 35

ORDER Granting 34 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 11 Motion to Dismiss. Replies due by 4/7/2017. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/30/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Case 2:17-cv-00085-JAD-CWH Document 34 Filed 03/30/17 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

CAMPBELL & WILLIAMS
DONALD J. CAMPBELL, ESQ. (1216)
[e-mail]
J. COLBY WILLIAMS, ESQ. (5549)
[e-mail]
700 South Seventh Street
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
Zuffa, LLC and Dana White

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10
11

MARK HUNT, an individual,

12

Plaintiffs,

13

vs.

14

ZUFFA, LLC d/b/a ULTIMATE FIGHTING
CHAMPIONSHIP, a Nevada limited liability
Company; BROCK LESNAR, an individual;
and DANA WHITE, an individual; and DOES
1-50, inclusive,

15
16
17
18

Defendants.
_______________________________________

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:17-cv-00085-JAD-CWH
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS ZUFFA, LLC AND
DANA WHITE TO FILE REPLY IN
SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
(First Request)

19

Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, 6-2 and LR 7-1, the undersigned counsel of record for

20

Plaintiff Mark Hunt and Defendants Zuffa, LLC and Dana White hereby STIPULATE to extend

21

the time for these Defendants to file a combined Reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss

22

(ECF No. 11) (the “Motion”). Defendants filed their Motion on February 28, 2017; Plaintiff

23
24
25
26

filed his Opposition to the Motion (ECF No. 19) on March 21, 2017; and the Court set this
matter for hearing on May 15, 2017 (ECF No. 13). Defendants’ Reply is currently due on March
31, 2017. If approved, the forgoing parties have agreed to a one-week extension to file the

27
28

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:17-cv-00085-JAD-CWH Document 34 Filed 03/30/17 Page 2 of 3

1
2

Reply, which would make it due on April 7, 2017. This is the first stipulation seeking to extend
the Reply deadline.

3

Defendants submit that good cause exists to approve the requested stipulation as their lead

4

counsel with responsibility for drafting the Reply will be out of the jurisdiction at the end of this

5

week on another matter, and will not return to the office until Tuesday, April 4, 2017. Granting

6
7
8
9
10
11

the requested one-week extension will provide Defendants with sufficient time to address the
numerous arguments raised in the Opposition without the necessity of altering the existing oral
argument date, which will still be more than one month away even after accounting for the
proposed new Reply date.
DATED: March 30, 2017

Respectfully submitted,

12

CAMPBELL & WILLIAMS

13

By___/s/ J. Colby Williams_____________
J. COLBY WILLIAMS, ESQ. (#5549)
700 South Seventh Street
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101

14
15
16
17

Attorneys for Defendants
Zuffa, LLC and Dana White

18

HIGGS FLETCHER & MACK LLP

19

By__/s/ Scott J. Ingold________________________
SCOTT J. INGOLD, ESQ. (Nev. Bar No. 11818)
401 West “A” Street, Suite 2600
San Diego, California 92101

20
21
22

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Mark Hunt

23
24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED:

26

By___________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

27

March 30, 2017
Dated:________________________________

28

Page 2 of 3