Zizi et al v. All About Service Limousine, Inc. et al

Filing 47

ORDER Granting 46 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: 42 Motion for Summary Judgment. Replies due by 8/21/2018. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 8/14/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1
2
3
4

JAMES P. KEMP, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6375
KEMP & KEMP
7435 W. Azure Dr., Suite 110
Las Vegas, Nevada 89130
[phone]/[phone] fax
[e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiffs Tsadok and Juley Zizi

5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7

***

8
9
10
11
12

TSADOK ZIZI and JULEY ZIZI,
vs.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants,

ALL ABOUT SERVICE LIMOUSINE, INC, a
Nevada Corporation; MICK MANLY,
Defendants-Counterclaimants.

13
14
15

Case No.: 2:17-cv-00088-RFB-VCF
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFFSCOUNTERDEFENDANTS TO
FILE REPLY TO OPPOSITION
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT ON
COUNTERCLAIMS
[FIRST REQUEST]

16
17

COME NOW Plaintiff-Counterdefendants and Defendants-Counterclaimants and through

18

their respective counsel of record, do hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for Plaintiff-

19

Counterdefendants to file a Reply to Defendants-Counterclaimants’ Opposition to Motion for

20

Summary Judgement as to the Counterclaims from August 14, 2018 through and including August

21

21, 2018. This Stipulation is brought based upon the following:

22

1. Plaintiff’s Counsel has informed Defense Counsel that he has been tied up with other

23
24

work since the Opposition was filed on July 31, 2018. Specifically, he has been preparing for a two

25

day arbitration that is taking place on August 14 and 15, 2018. This along with multiple client

26

meetings, preparation for and attending a workers’ compensation appeal, responding to an

27

emergency motion on an order shortening time in state court last week, and having to travel out of

28
1

1

state on a personal matter on August 10-12 has delayed drafting the Reply in this matter.

2
3

2. The extension of time to file the Reply to Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment
on Counterclaims will be adequate to permit Plaintiff’s counsel to complete the work and get it

4
5
6

filed.
This extension of time is sought in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.

7
8

Dated: August 13, 2018

Dated: August 13, 2018

/s/
James P. Kemp
James P. Kemp, Esq.
KEMP & KEMP ATTORNEYS AT LAW
7435 West Azure Drive, Suite 110
Las Vegas, NV 89130
[phone]/ 258-6983 fax
Attorney for Plaintiffs

/s/
Anthony B. Golden
Anthony B. Golden, Esq.
GARG GOLDEN LAW FIRM
3185 St. Rose Parkway, Suite 325
Henderson, NV 89052
[phone] / [phone] fax
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

ORDER

17
18

IT IS SO ORDERED.

19
20

22

__________________________
______________________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
DISTRICT JUDGE/MAGISTRATE JUDGE
United States District Court

23

August 14, 2018.
Dated: _________________________________

21

24
25
26
27
28
2