Dunlap v. Wells Fargo Financial et al

Filing 22

ORDER that 14 Experian's Motion to Consolidate or Limit Depositions and 16 Request for Order Shortening Time are DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 5/9/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6

***

7

CAROL A. DUNLAP,

8
9
10

v.

Case No. 2:17-cv-00097-RFB-PAL
Plaintiff,

ORDER
(Mot Consolidate – ECF No. 14)
(Mot to Shorten Time – ECF No. 16)

WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL, et al.,
Defendants.

11
12

Before the court is Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.’s (“Experian”) Motion

13

to Consolidate or Limit Depositions (ECF No. 14) and Request for Order Shortening Time (ECF

14

No. 16). The court has reviewed the motions, Declarations to the Motions (ECF Nos. 15, 17),

15

plaintiff’s Response (ECF No. 20), Experian’s Reply (ECF No. 21) and Judge Koppe’s Order

16

(ECF No. 23) on the same motion filed in Ashcraft v. Welk Resort Group, Corp., et al, Case No.

17

2:16-cv-02978-JAD-NJK.

18

After reviewing the moving and responsive papers, and Judge Koppe’s order on the same

19

issue in the related action Ashcraft v. Welk Resort Group, Corp., et al., Case No. 2:16-cv-02978,

20

(ECF No. 23), the court wholeheartedly agrees with her well-reasoned analysis and decision.

21

IT IS ORDERED that Experian’s Motion to Consolidate or Limit Depositions (ECF No.

22
23

14) and Request for Order Shortening Time (ECF No. 16) are DENIED.
DATED this 9th day of May, 2017.

24
25
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
1