Pathak v. Pathak et al
Filing
3
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file a Certificate as to Interested Parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than February 10, 2017. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. on 01/30/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
10
11
12
NERRY PATHAK,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
ANSHU BHARAT PATHAK, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:17-cv-00102-RFB-GWF
ORDER
13
14
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s failure to file a Certificate as to Interested Parties
15
as required by LR 7.1-1. The Complaint (ECF No. 1) in this matter was filed January 11, 2017. LR
16
7.1-1 requires that pro se parties and attorneys for private non-governmental parties must, upon
17
entering a case, file a certificate as to interested parties, listing all persons, firms, partnerships or
18
corporations, known to have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case, including the
19
names of all parent subsidiary, affiliate and/or insider of the named non-individual parties. If there
20
are no known interested parties, other than those participating in the case, a statement to that effect
21
must be filed. To date, Plaintiff has failed to comply. Accordingly,
22
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file a Certificate as to Interested Parties, which fully
23
complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than February 10, 2017. Failure to comply may result in the
24
issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed.
25
DATED this 30th day of January, 2017.
26
27
28
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?