Emerson v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
Filing
18
ORDER Granting 17 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 7/12/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
David H. Krieger, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9086
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
8985 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 350
Henderson, Nevada 89123
Phone: (702) 880-5554
FAX: (702) 385-5518
Email: dkrieger@hainesandkrieger.com
Attorney for Plaintiff, ELNORA EMERSON
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
ELNORA EMERSON,
10
11
Plaintiff,
v.
12
13
14
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC;
EQUIFAX INFORMATION
SERVICES, LLC; TRANS UNION,
LLC,
15
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:17-cv-00108-RFB-NJK
STIPULATION AND ORDER
DISMISSING ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE AS TO OCWEN LOAN
SERVICING, LLC ONLY
16
17
Plaintiff ELNORA EMERSON and Defendant OCWEN LOAN
18
SERVICING, LLC hereby stipulate and agree that the above-entitled action shall
19
…
20
…
21
…
22
…
23
…
24
…
25
…
26
Page 1 of 2
27
28
1
be dismissed with prejudice in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (a)(2) as to, and
2
ONLY as to, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC. Each party shall bear its own
3
attorney's fees, and costs of suit.
Dated:
4
July 10, 2017
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
By:
/s/David H. Krieger, Esq.
David H. Krieger, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9086
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
8985 S. Eastern Avenue
Suite 350
Henderson, Nevada 89123
Attorney for Plaintiff
By:
/s/ Jacob D. Bundick, Esq.
Jacob D. Bundick, Esq.
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
3773 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 400 North
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Attorney for Defendant OCWEN
LOAN SERVICING, LLC
13
14
15
16
ORDER
17
IT IS SO ORDERED:
ORDERED
18
19
20
21
____________________________
__________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
United States District Judge
July 12, 2017.
DATED: ____________________
22
23
24
25
26
Page 2 of 2
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?