ME2 Productions, Inc. v. Does
Filing
7
ORDER Granting 4 Ex Parte Motion for Leave to Take Limited Discovery Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference. Plaintiff will have until February 24, 2017, to discover the actual names of the Doe Defendants through discovery, and to file a request to amend the complaint to provide the actual names of the Doe Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/13/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
12
13
14
15
ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC.,
)
)
Plaintiff(s),
)
)
)
vs.
)
)
DOES 1-23,
)
)
Defendant(s).
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:17-cv-00114-APG-NJK
ORDER GRANTING MOTION
FOR DISCOVERY
(Docket No. 4)
16
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave to take limited discovery. Docket
17
No. 4. In particular, Plaintiff submits that it is suing each of the Defendants for using the Internet
18
and BitTorrent to commit direct and contributory copyright infringement and, since the alleged
19
infringement occurred over the Internet, Plaintiff knows the Defendants only by their Internet
20
Protocol (“IP”) addresses. Id. at 2. Plaintiff therefore seeks an order allowing it to subpoena the Doe
21
Defendants’ Internet Service Provider(s) (“ISP”) for the true name, address, telephone number, e-
22
mail address, and Media Access Control address of each Doe Defendant in order to identify these
23
defendants 1-23. Id. at 6.
24
The Ninth Circuit has held that, where the identity of defendants is unknown prior to the
25
filing of a complaint, the plaintiff should be given an opportunity through discovery to identify the
26
unknown defendant, unless it is clear that discovery would not uncover the identities of the
27
defendants, or that the complaint would be dismissed on other grounds. See Wakefield v. Thompson,
28
177 F.3d 1160, 1163 (9th Cir. 1999) (citing Gillespie v. Civiletti, 629 F.2d 637, 642 (9th Cir. 1980)).
1
Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion. Docket No. 4.
2
Plaintiff may serve Rule 45 subpoenas upon the ISPs and any related intermediary ISPs that own the
3
IP addresses at issue in the instant case. These subpoenas will demand solely the true name, address,
4
telephone number, e-mail address, and Media Access Control address for the account holder to
5
whom the relevant IP addresses were assigned at the date(s) and time(s) that the alleged infringement
6
activity occurred. Plaintiff will use the information it obtains from the ISPs in response to these
7
subpoenas solely to prosecute the claims it has made in the instant case. Plaintiff will have until
8
February 24, 2017, to discover the actual names of the Doe Defendants through discovery, and to
9
file a request to amend the complaint to provide the actual names of the Doe Defendants.
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
Dated: January 13, 2017
12
13
14
15
________________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?