ME2 Productions, Inc. v. Does

Filing 12

ORDER re 10 Motion for Hearing re Subpoena. The Court construes the letter as a motion to quash the subpoena Plaintiff served on Internet Service Providers. The pending motion is DENIED without prejudice. Ms. Jones is instructed that she is free to file a new motion to quash the subpoena, but any such motion must identify the grounds on which she believes the subpoena is improper. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 4/28/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF: cc C. Jones - MMM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC.,
11
12
13
14
15

)
)
Plaintiff(s),
)
)
vs.
)
)
JOHN AND JANE DOES,
)
)
Defendant(s).
)
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:17-cv-00121-JCM-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 10)

16

Pending before the Court is a motion filed by Cassandra Jones related to a subpoena she has

17

received. Docket No. 10. As Ms. Jones is appearing pro se, the Court construes her filings liberally. The

18

Court construes the letter as a motion to quash the subpoena Plaintiff served on Internet Service Providers.

19

The motion does not identify the grounds on which Ms. Jones believes the subpoena is improper, however.

20

Accordingly, the pending motion is DENIED without prejudice. Ms. Jones is instructed that she is free

21

to file a new motion to quash the subpoena, but any such motion must identify the grounds on which she

22

believes the subpoena is improper.

23
24

The Clerk’s Office is instructed to serve a copy of this order on Ms. Jones at the address identified
in her motion.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED

26

Dated: April 28, 2017

27
28

________________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge