ME2 Productions, Inc. v. Does

Filing 14

ORDER that 13 Motion to Quash Subpoena is DENIED without prejudice. Interested Party ID No. 6 is instructed that he or she is free to file a new motion to quash the subpoena, but any such motion must identify the grounds on which he or she believes the subpoena is improper. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/2/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF: cc ID No. 6 - MMM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC.,
11
12
13
14
15

)
)
Plaintiff(s),
)
)
vs.
)
)
JOHN AND JANE DOES,
)
)
Defendant(s).
)
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:17-cv-00121-JCM-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 13)

16

Pending before the Court is a motion filed by Interested Party ID No. 6 related to a subpoena he or

17

she has received. Docket No. 13. As Interested Party ID No. 6 is appearing pro se, the Court construes the

18

filing liberally. The Court construes the letter as a motion to quash the subpoena Plaintiff served on Internet

19

Service Providers. The motion does not identify the grounds on which Interested Party ID No. 6 believes

20

the subpoena is improper, however. Accordingly, the pending motion is DENIED without prejudice.

21

Interested Party ID No. 6 is instructed that he or she is free to file a new motion to quash the subpoena, but

22

any such motion must identify the grounds on which he or she believes the subpoena is improper.

23
24

The Clerk’s Office is instructed to serve a copy of this order on Interested Party ID No. 6 at the
return address identified in the motion.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED

26

Dated: May 2, 2017

27
28

________________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge