ME2 Productions, Inc. v. Does

Filing 5

ORDER that 3 Ex Parte Motion for Leave to Take Discovery is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/24/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC.,

15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

16

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s ex parte motion for leave to take discovery. Docket

17

No. 3. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were amended effective December 1, 2015. The Local

18

Rules were amended effective May 1, 2016. The pending motion relies upon previous versions of

19

both rules. See, e.g., Docket No. 3 at 1 (quoting no-longer existent Local Rule 7-5); id. at 3 (quoting

20

language that has been excised from Rule 26(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure).1

21

Accordingly, the pending motion is DENIED without prejudice.

11
Plaintiff(s),
12
vs.
13
DOES 1-22,
14
Defendant(s).

22

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23

Case No. 2:17-cv-00126-JCM-NJK

Dated: January 24, 2017

24
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge

25
26
27
28

1

The 2015 amendment to the federal rules “deletes the former provision authorizing the
court, for good cause, to order discovery of any matter relevant to the subject matter involved in the
action.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, Advisory Committee Notes (2015).