Pathak v. Yahoo!, Inc. et al

Filing 4

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a Certificate as to Interested Parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than 3/10/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 3/3/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 10 11 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) vs. ) YAHOO!, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) ANSHU PATHAK, Case No. 2:17-cv-00130-GMN-GWF ORDER 12 13 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s failure to file a Certificate as to Interested Parties 14 as required by LR 7.1-1. The Complaint (ECF No. 1) in this matter was filed January 13, 2017. LR 15 7.1-1 requires that pro se parties and attorneys for private non-governmental parties must, upon 16 entering a case, file a certificate as to interested parties, listing all persons, firms, partnerships or 17 corporations, known to have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case, including the 18 names of all parent subsidiary, affiliate and/or insider of the named non-individual parties. If there 19 are no known interested parties, other than those participating in the case, a statement to that effect 20 must be filed. To date, Plaintiff has failed to comply. Accordingly, 21 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a Certificate as to Interested Parties, which fully 22 complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than March 10, 2017. Failure to comply may result in the issuance 23 of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. 24 DATED this 3rd day of March, 2017. 25 26 27 28 ______________________________________ GEORGE FOLEY, JR. United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?