Pathak v. Yahoo!, Inc. et al
Filing
49
ORDER Granting 48 Motion for Pro Se Litigant to File Electronically. See Order for details/deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 8/8/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
10
11
12
ANSHU PATHAK,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
YAHOO!, INC., et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:17-cv-00130-GMN-GWF
ORDER
13
14
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Pro Se Litigant to File Electronically
15
(ECF No. 48), filed on August 1, 2017. Plaintiff requests permission to file all future pleadings
16
electronically through the Court’s CM/ECF filing system. The Court will allow Plaintiff to file future
17
documents electronically only after he has demonstrated a basic understanding and familiarity with
18
the CM/ECF filing system. Accordingly,
19
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Permission for Pro Se to File
20
Electronically (ECF No. 48) is granted subject to complying with the following procedures in order to
21
activate his CM/ECF account:
22
a.
On or before September 7, 2017, Plaintiff must provide certification that he has
23
completed the CM/ECF tutorial and is familiar with Electronic Filing Procedures, Best
24
Practices, and the Civil & Criminal Events Menu that are accessible on this court’s
25
website, www.nvd.uscourts.gov.
26
b.
27
28
Plaintiff is not authorized to file electronically until said certification is filed with the
Court within the time frame specified.
...
1
2
3
c.
Upon timely filing of the certification, Plaintiff shall contact the CM/ECF Help Desk
at (702) 464-5555 to set up a CM/ECF account.
DATED this 8th day of August, 2017.
4
5
6
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?