Uehara v. TD Bank, National Association, et al
Filing
43
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 31 Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.'s Motion to Consolidate or Limit Depositions is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 5/4/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
4
5
6
7
8
9
RUSSELL K. UEHARA,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
TD BANK, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:17-cv-00190-GMN-CWH
ORDER
10
11
Presently before the court is Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.’s Motion to
12
Consolidate or Limit Depositions (ECF No. 31), filed on April 19, 2017. The motion is supported
13
by the declaration of Jennifer L. Braster (ECF No. 32), filed on April 19, 2017. Plaintiff Russell K.
14
Uehara filed a response (ECF No. 37) on April 25, 2017. Defendant filed a reply (ECF No. 38),
15
supported by the declaration of Jennifer L. Braster (ECF No. 39), on April 26, 2017. The court
16
held a hearing on the motion on April 27, 2017. (Mins. of Proceedings (ECF No. 40).)
17
After reviewing and considering the briefs and hearing the parties’ arguments, the court is
18
not convinced there is enough common ground to make consolidation of the five depositions at
19
issue a workable solution at this time. The court therefore will deny the motion to consolidate the
20
depositions and the parties will have to continue with case-by-case depositions for the time being.
21
The court remains committed to assisting the attorneys and parties in reducing the costs and
22
avoiding duplication in these cases, however, and encourages the parties to persist in their meet-
23
and-confer efforts.
24
25
26
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.’s
Motion to Consolidate or Limit Depositions (ECF No. 31) is DENIED without prejudice.
DATED: May 4, 2017
27
28
______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?