Bank of New York Mellon v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al
Filing
44
ORDER Granting 41 Motion for Service by Publication. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 42 SFR's Motion to Enlarge Time to Serve is GRANTED and the time for service is extended by an additional 60 days from the date of this order is entered to allow SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR") to effectuate service by publication. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 6/6/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
Case 2:17-cv-00210-JCM-CWH Document 43 Filed 06/05/17 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
DIANA CLINE EBRON, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10580
E-mail: diana@KGElegal.com
JACQUELINE A. GILBERT, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10593
E-mail: jackie@KGElegal.com
KAREN L. HANKS, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9578
E-mail: karen@KGElegal.com
KIM GILBERT EBRON
7625 Dean Martin Drive, Suite 110
Las Vegas, Nevada 89139
Telephone: (702) 485-3300
Facsimile: (702) 485-3301
Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
(702) 485-3300 FAX (702) 485-3301
KIM GILBERT EBRON
7625 DEAN MARTIN DRIVE, SUITE 110
LAS VEGAS, NV 89139
11
13
14
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FKA
THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE
FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF
THE CWABS, INC. ASSET-BACKED
CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-17,
Plaintiff,
15
16
17
18
19
20
Case No. 2:17-cv-00210-JCM-CWH
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SERVE
MASHELLE RODERICK SMITH BY
PUBLICATION
-and-
vs.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
ENLARGE TIME TO SERVE SUMMONS
AND CROSS-CLAIM
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC;
ALIANTE MASTER ASSOCIATION,
Defendants.
______________________________________
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, a
Nevada limited liability company,
Counter/Cross Claimant,
21
22
23
vs.
27
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FKA
THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE
FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF
THE CWABS, INC. ASSET-BACKED
CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-17;
COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC.;
RODERICK SMITH, an individual;
MELINDA SMITH, an individual
28
Counter/Cross Defendants.
24
25
26
-1-
Case 2:17-cv-00210-JCM-CWH Document 43 Filed 06/05/17 Page 2 of 2
1
Upon reading the Affidavit of Due Diligence [ECF No. 36]; it appearing that an Answer,
2
Counterclaim, and Cross-Claim has been filed; that a Summons directed to Cross-Defendant,
3
RODERICK SMITH (“Smith”) has been issued [ECF No. 25]; that Cross-Defendant, Smith is a
4
necessary party; and that Cross-Defendant Smith cannot be found to be personally served in the
5
State of Nevada, and good cause appearing therefore,
6
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that since the Cross-Defendant, RODERICK SMITH,
7
cannot now be found so as to be personally served, he may be served by publication of the
8
Summons at least once a week for four (4) weeks in the Nevada Legal News, a newspaper of
9
general circulation, pursuant to FRCP 4(e)(1) and NRCP 4(e)(1).
10
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of the Summons and Answer, Counterclaim,
11
prepaid, addressed to the Cross-Defendant’s last known address.
(702) 485-3300 FAX (702) 485-3301
KIM GILBERT EBRON
7625 DEAN MARTIN DRIVE, SUITE 110
LAS VEGAS, NV 89139
and Cross-Claim shall be mailed forthwith to Cross-Defendant Smith, first class mail, postage
12
13
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that SFR’s Motion to Enlarge Time to Serve is GRANTED
14
and the time for service is extended by an additional 60 days from the date of this order is entered
15
16
to allow SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (“SFR”) to effectuate service by publication.
DATED: June 6,day of ________________, 2017.
Dated this ____ 2017
17
18
19
__________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Submitted by:
KIM GILBERT EBRON
/s/Diana Cline Ebron
Diana Cline Ebron, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10580
Jacqueline A. Gilbert, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10593
Karen L. Hanks, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9578
7625 Dean Martin Drive, Suite 110
Las Vegas, Nevada 89139
Phone: (702) 485-3300
Fax: (702) 485-3301
Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?