Ocegueda v. Nevens

Filing 28

ORDER granting 25 Motion to Stay Case; Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/11/2019.; Case stayed.; Case terminated. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 ANA OCEGUEDA, 5 6 7 Petitioner, Case No. 2:17-cv-00267-APG-GWF ORDER v. WARDEN NEVEN, et al., 8 Respondents. 9 10 Petitioner Ana Ocegueda moves to stay this action because she is seeking relief from the 11 judgment in an earlier action, Ocegueda v. Gentry, Case No. 2:15-cv-01884-JCM-GWF. ECF No. 12 25. If she obtains relief in that action, then this action becomes redundant. If she does not obtain 13 relief in that action, she can move to reopen this action. Staying this case makes sense. 14 15 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s motion to stay (ECF No. 25) is GRANTED. 16 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is STAYED pending resolution of the 17 motion for relief from the judgment in Ocegueda v. Gentry, Case No. 2:15-cv-01884-JCM-GWF. 18 Ocegueda must file a motion to reopen this case within 45 days of resolution of the motion in 19 Ocegueda v. Gentry, Case No. 2:15-cv-01884-JCM-GWF. Further, Ocegueda or the respondents 20 otherwise may move to reopen this case and seek any relief appropriate under the circumstances. 21 22 23 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of court shall administratively close this action until the court grants a motion to reopen the case. DATED: January 11, 2019. 24 ______________________________ ANDREW P. GORDON United States District Judge 25 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?