JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al

Filing 38

ORDER Granting 37 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request) re 22 MOTION to Dismiss. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. has seven days from granting of Stipulation to file an Opposition. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 8/30/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) (Modified to remove Response deadline on 8/31/2017)

Case 2:17-cv-00324-GMN-PAL Document 37 Filed 08/25/17 Page 1 of 4

1 Abran E. Vigil
Nevada Bar No. 7548
2
Justin A. Shiroff
3 Nevada Bar No. 12869
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
4 100 North City Parkway, Suite 1750
Las Vegas, Nevada 89106
5
Telephone: [phone]
6 Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
7 [e-mail]
8

Attorney for Plaintiff
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
9

Ballard Spahr LLP
100 North City Parkway, Suite 1750
Las Vegas, Nevada 89106-4617

10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

12

13 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., a
national banking association,
14
Plaintiff,

15
16 vs.
17

SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, a
18 Nevada limited liability company; THE
WILLOWS HOMEOWNERS’
19 ASSOCIATION, a Nevada non-profit
corporation; DANIEL A. RICHARD, an
20
individual,
21
Defendants.
22
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, a
23 Nevada limited liability company,
24
25
26

Counterclaimant/Cross-Claimant,
vs.

27 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;
DANIEL A. RICHARD, an individual,
28
Counter-Defendant/Cross-Defendants.
DMWEST #16964729 v1

Case No. 2:17-CV-00324-GMN-PAL
STIPULATION TO ALLOW
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TO
FILE A LATE OPPOSITION TO SFR
INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC’S
MOTION TO DISMISS JPMORGAN
CHASE BANK, N.A.’S COMPLAINT
PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 12(b)(7) [ECF
NO. 22]
(FIRST REQUEST)

Case 2:17-cv-00324-GMN-PAL Document 37 Filed 08/25/17 Page 2 of 4

1

Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) and Defendant SFR

2 Investments Pool 1, LLC (“SFR”) (collectively, the “Parties”), through their counsel
3 of record, hereby stipulate to allow Chase to file a late opposition to SFR’s Motion to
4 Dismiss JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s Complaint Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(7)
5 [ECF No. 22, filed June 23, 2017] (“SFR’s Motion”), as follows:
6

1.

On February 2, 2017, Chase filed its complaint in this action

7 (“Complaint”), naming The Willows Homeowners’ Association (the “HOA”) as a
8 necessary party [ECF No. 1].
9

2.

On June 6, 2017, the HOA filed a motion to dismiss Chase’s

Ballard Spahr LLP
100 North City Parkway, Suite 1750
Las Vegas, Nevada 89106-4617

10 Complaint [ECF No. 16] (the “HOA’s Motion”).
11

3.

Counsel for Chase entered into negotiations with counsel for the

12 HOA regarding a potential stipulated resolution to the HOA’s Motion.
13

4.

During the pendency of these negotiations, on June 23, 2017, SFR

14 filed a related Motion to Dismiss JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s Complaint
15 Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(7) [ECF No. 22] (“SFR’s Motion”).
16

5.

Oppositions to SFR’s Motion were due on July 7, 2017.

17

6.

Ultimately, Chase failed to reach a stipulated resolution to the

18 HOA’s Motion.
19

7.

On July 6, 2017, Chase and the HOA entered into a Stipulation to

20 extend Chase’s time to oppose the HOA’s Motion [ECF No. 26].
21

8.

The Court granted the Stipulated Extension [ECF No. 27, Jul. 10,

22 2017] and Chase timely filed its Opposition to the HOA’s Motion on July 21, 2017.
23 [ECF No. 28].
24

9.

Through an inadvertent mistake by Chase’s undersigned counsel,

25 Chase did not timely file an opposition to SFR’s Motion in the alternative.
26

10.

Upon discovering this unintentional omission, Chase’s undersigned

27 counsel immediately began taking steps to remedy the issue.
28
DMWEST #16964729 v1

2

Case 2:17-cv-00324-GMN-PAL Document 37 Filed 08/25/17 Page 3 of 4

11.

1

Accordingly, the Parties hereby agree to allow Chase seven days

2 from grant of this Stipulation to file its opposition.
12.

3

SFR shall file any reply to Chase’s opposition in the ordinary

4 course.
5

13.

This is the Parties’ first request to extend time for this opposition.

6

14.

There is no pending hearing date for SFR’s Motion.

7

15.

The Parties agree to this extension to facilitate a full consideration

8 of the merits of the Motion and an opportunity for all parties to fully brief it.
The request is made in good faith and is not intended to prejudice or cause

9

Ballard Spahr LLP
100 North City Parkway, Suite 1750
Las Vegas, Nevada 89106-4617

10 delay.
11 Dated: August 25, 2017

Dated: August 25, 2017

12 BALLARD SPAHR LLP

KIM GILBERT EBRON

13

By: /s/ Justin A. Shiroff
14 Abran E. Vigil
Nevada Bar No. 7548
15 Justin A. Shiroff
Nevada Bar No. 12869
16 100 North City Parkway, Suite 1750
Las Vegas, Nevada 89106
17
18

By: /s/ Diana Cline Ebron
Diana Cline Ebron
Nevada Bar No. 10580
Jackie A. Gilbert
Nevada Bar No. 10593
Karen Hanks
Nevada Bar No. 9578
7625 Dean Martin Dr., Suite 110
Las Vegas, Nevada 89014

Counsel for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Counsel for SFR Investments Pool 1,
LLC

19
20

ORDER

21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23
24

30
Signed this _____ day of August, 2017.

25
_____________________________________
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

26
27
28
DMWEST #16964729 v1

3

Case 2:17-cv-00324-GMN-PAL Document 37 Filed 08/25/17 Page 4 of 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

1
2

I hereby certify that on August 25, 2017, and pursuant to F.R.C.P. 5, a true

3 copy of the foregoing STIPULATION TO ALLOW JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
4 TO FILE A LATE OPPOSITION TO SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC’S
5 MOTION TO DISMISS JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.’S COMPLAINT
6 PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 12(b)(7) [ECF NO. 22] (FIRST REQUEST) was filed via
7 the Court’s CM/ECF System and electronically served by the Court on all parties in
8 interest.
9

Ballard Spahr LLP
100 North City Parkway, Suite 1750
Las Vegas, Nevada 89106-4617

10

/s/ Sarah Walton
An Employee of Ballard Spahr LLP

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DMWEST #16964729 v1

4