JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al
ORDER that 61 Stipulation to Stay Discovery is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/17/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, et al.,
Case No. 2:17-cv-00326-JCM-NJK
(Docket No. 61)
Pending before the Court is a stipulation to stay discovery pending resolution of two motions to
dismiss. Docket No. 61. The parties indicate that it is in the interest of efficiency to stay discovery. See
id. at 2 (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 1). The parties fail to explain, however, how a stay of discovery would
be efficient at this stage given that discovery is set to close in less than a month. See Docket No. 30
(scheduling order entered on August 1, 2017, setting discovery cutoff of December 11, 2017).
Accordingly, the stipulation is DENIED without prejudice to a renewed request to stay discovery
explaining why a stay is appropriate at this late juncture. Any such request must also identify with
particularity the discovery conducted to date. Cf. Local Rule 26-4(a).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: November 17, 2017
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?