JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al

Filing 45

ORDER Granting 40 Motion for Service by Publication. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 41 SFR's Motion to Enlarge Time to Serve is GRANTED and the time for service is extended by an additional 60 days from the date of this order is entered to allow SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (SFR) to effectuate service by publication. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 9/26/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-00328-JCM-PAL Document 42 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DIANA CLINE EBRON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10580 E-mail: diana@KGElegal.com JACQUELINE A. GILBERT, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10593 E-mail: jackie@KGElegal.com KAREN L. HANKS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9578 E-mail: karen@KGElegal.com KIM GILBERT EBRON 7625 Dean Martin Drive, Suite 110 Las Vegas, Nevada 89139 Telephone: (702) 485-3300 Facsimile: (702) 485-3301 Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 (702) 485-3300 FAX (702) 485-3301 KIM GILBERT EBRON 7625 DEAN MARTIN DRIVE, SUITE 110 LAS VEGAS, NV 89139 11 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 18 Case No. 2:17-cv-00328-JCM-PAL ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SERVE ZENA F. N. CHEE BY PUBLICATION vs. SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; DIAMOND CREEK COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, a Nevada non-profit corporation; DIAMOND CREEK HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, a Nevada non-profit corporation; ZENA F. N. CHEE, an individual, 20 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO SERVE SUMMONS AND CROSS-CLAIM Defendant. ______________________________________ SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, 21 -and- Counterclaimant/Cross-Claimant, 19 22 vs. 23 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; ZENA F. N. CHEE, an individual, 24 Counter/Cross Defendants. 25 26 Upon reading the Affidavit of Due Diligence; it appearing that an Answer, Counterclaim, 27 and Cross-Claim has been filed; that a Summons directed to Cross-Defendant, ZENA F. N. CHEE 28 has been issued [ECF No. 25]; that Cross-Defendant, Chee is a necessary party; and that Cross-1- Case 2:17-cv-00328-JCM-PAL Document 42 Filed 09/08/17 Page 2 of 2 1 Defendant Chee cannot be found to be personally served in the State of Nevada, and good cause 2 appearing therefore, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that since the Cross-Defendant, ZENA F. N. CHEE, cannot 4 now be found so as to be personally served, she may be served by publication of the Summons at 5 least once a week for four (4) weeks in the Nevada Legal News, a newspaper of general circulation, 6 at least once a week for four (4) weeks in, a newspaper of general circulation in Hauula, Hawaii 7 and at least once a week for four (4) weeks in, a newspaper of general circulation in E. Stroudsburg, 8 PA. and Cross-Claim shall be mailed forthwith to Cross-Defendant Chee, first class mail, postage 11 prepaid, addressed to the Cross-Defendant’s last known addresses. 12 (702) 485-3300 FAX (702) 485-3301 KIM GILBERT EBRON IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of the Summons and Answer, Counterclaim, 10 7625 DEAN MARTIN DRIVE, SUITE 110 LAS VEGAS, NV 89139 9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that SFR’s Motion to Enlarge Time to Serve is GRANTED 13 and the time for service is extended by an additional 60 days from the date of this order is entered 14 to allow SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (“SFR”) to effectuate service by publication. 15 16 Dated this 26th day of September, 2017. 17 ___________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 Submitted by: 20 KIM GILBERT EBRON 21 /s/Diana Cline Ebron Diana Cline Ebron, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10580 Jacqueline A. Gilbert, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10593 Karen L. Hanks, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9578 7625 Dean Martin Drive, Suite 110 Las Vegas, Nevada 89139 Phone: (702) 485-3300 Fax: (702) 485-3301 Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?