JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al
ORDER Denying without prejudice pending 46 , 47 , and 49 Motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/3/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, et al.,
Case No. 2:17-cv-00329-JCM-NJK
(Docket Nos. 46, 47, 49)
Pending before the Court are SFR’s motions to extend the time for service and motion to serve
by publication. Docket Nos. 46, 47, 49. With respect to extending the deadline to effectuate service,
SFR cites only the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure and state case law. SFR has failed to cite any legal
authority or provide any explanation as to why such a deadline in federal court is governed by state law.1
Accordingly, the pending motions are DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 3, 2017
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
The only federal legal authority provided in the motions is a block quotation of Rule 4(e) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which provides that the manner of service may be in accordance with state
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?