United States of America v. $417,073.00 in United States Currency, et al.
Filing
8
ORDER Granting 7 Fourth Unopposed Motion to Continue CAFRA Deadline until 10/11/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 8/31/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Case 2:17-cv-00344-JAD-CWH Document 7 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 3
1 STEVEN W. MYHRE
Acting United States Attorney
2 Nevada Bar No. 9635
MICHAEL A. HUMPHREYS
3 Assistant United States Attorney
U.S. Attorney’s Office
4 501 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
5 Telephone: 702-388-6336
Facsimile: 702-388-6787
6 Email: michael.humphreys@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for the United States.
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
11
Plaintiff,
v.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
$417,073.00 IN UNITED STATES
CURRENCY seized from the premises of
2656 North Ontario Street, Las Vegas
Nevada;
$28,230.05 IN UNITED STATES
CURRENCY seized from J.P. Morgan
Chase Account No. xxxxxxx2849;
$21,146.37 in UNITED STATES
CURRENCY seized from J.P. Morgan
Chase Bank Account No. xxxxxx5561;
19
20
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:17-CV-344-JAD-(CWH)
United States’ Unopposed Application To
Continue CAFRA Deadline
(Fourth Request)
COMES NOW The United States of America and moves this Court to extend the
21 CAFRA (Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act) deadline for 30 days or until October 11, 2017. The
22 current CAFRA deadline for the Government to file its complaint is September 11, 2017.
23
This is the Government’s Fourth request for an extension of the CAFRA deadline. On
24 June 5, 2017, this Court granted a 90-day continuance until September 11, 2017.
25
26 / / /
This motion is unopposed by Claimants’ Counsel.
Case 2:17-cv-00344-JAD-CWH Document 7 Filed 08/30/17 Page 2 of 3
1
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the United States has 90 days to file a civil
2 complaint, if an interested party files a timely administrative claim with the seizing agency. In
3 this case, Customs and Border Patrol seized the above referenced defendants on August 17,
4 2016; and the claimants, Zalmai and Sona Basharyar, filed administrative claims with the
5 Department of Homeland Security (United States Customs and Border Patrol) on November 10,
6 2016. As such, the United States was obliged to file its civil complaint in this case by February
7 10, 2017. In an uncontested motion filed on February 3, 2017, the United States requested an
8 additional sixty (60) days to file a civil forfeiture complaint in this case because it (the United
9 States) was still in the process of determining whether there was/is sufficient evidence to file
10 such a complaint. The United States was (and still is) gathering and analyzing evidence,
11 specifically bank and tax records to determine whether it can meet the burden of the
12 preponderance of evidence necessary to file a complaint.
13
Accordingly, the United States requests an additional thirty days (or until October 11,
14 2017) to complete its financial analysis and determine whether to file a complaint in this matter.
15
Counsel for the Government has consulted with the Claimants’ counsel, Gabriel Grasso,
16 and he has authorized Government counsel to represent to this Court that he does not object to
17 this motion.
18
This motion is not submitted solely for the purpose to delay or for any other improper
19 purpose.
20 / / /
21 / / /
22 / / /
23 / / /
24 / / /
25 / / /
26 / / /
2
Case 2:17-cv-00344-JAD-CWH Document 7 Filed 08/30/17 Page 3 of 3
1
WHEREFORE, for all of the reasons stated above, the United States moves this Court to
2 continue the CAFRA deadline thirty (30) days or until October 11, 2017.
3
Dated: August 30, 2017
4
STEVEN W. MYHRE
Acting United States Attorney
5
6
/s/ Michael A. Humphreys
MICHAEL A. HUMPHREYS
Assistant United States Attorney
7
8
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED:
12
DATED:
August 31, 2017
13
14
15
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?