TPOV Enterprises 16, LLC v. Paris Las Vegas Operating Company, LLC

Filing 183

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff TPOV file SEALED versions of its Opposition 158 , its Cross-Motion 159 , and the accompanying Exhibits (ECF Nos. 158-1 through 158-7; 158-10 through 158-18; ECF Nos. 159-1 through 159-7; 159-10 through 159-18). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that TPOV may alternatively WITHDRAW the motion to seal and file unredacted and unsealed versions of the Opposition, Cross Motion, and Exhibits. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that TPOV has until 9:00 am on Monday, 2/10/2020 to comply with the Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 2/7/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 *** 6 TPOV ENTERPRISES 16, LLC, 7 Plaintiff, 2:17-cv-00346-JCM-VCF 8 9 10 vs. PARIS LAS VEGAS OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, ORDER Defendant. 11 12 13 Before the court is TPOV Enterprises, 16, LLC’s and Counter-Defendant TPOV Enterprises, 14 LLC’s motion to seal. (ECF No. 160). This Court has scheduled a hearing on TPOV’s motion to seal, 15 along with several other motions, for Monday, February 10, 2020. (ECF No. 182). TPOV moves the Court 16 for an Order redacting 1) its opposition to Paris Las Vegas Operating Company, LLC’s motion for 17 terminating sanctions (ECF No. 158) (“Opposition”); 2) to redact its cross motion for sanctions (ECF No. 18 159) (“Cross Motion”); and 3) to seal the accompanying Exhibits 1-7 and 10-18 (ECF Nos. 158-1 through 19 158-7; 158-10 through 158-18; ECF Nos. 159-1 through 159-7; 159-10 through 159-18) (“Exhibits”). (Id. 20 at 160). TPOV argues that the redacted information is confidential and non-public information designated 21 confidential and/or highly confidential under the stipulated protective order. (Id. at 1-2). TPOV filed its 22 Opposition and Cross Motion in redacted form and with blank Exhibits, but TPOV did not file a sealed 23 version of its Opposition, Cross Motion, or Exhibits. Paris filed an opposition to TPOV’s motion to seal. 24 (ECF No. 168). TPOV did not file a reply. 25 1 1 The Court orders that TPOV file sealed versions of its Opposition, Cross Motion, and Exhibits, so 2 that the Court can review the arguments and information that TPOV redacted. Pursuant to Local Rule 10- 3 5(a), “[a]ll papers filed under seal will remain sealed until the court either denies the motion to seal or 4 enters an order unsealing them.” TPOV may, alternatively, withdraw the motion to seal and file unredacted 5 and unsealed versions of the Opposition, Cross Motion, and Exhibits. 6 Accordingly, 7 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff TPOV file SEALED versions of its Opposition (ECF 8 No. 158), its Cross-Motion (ECF No. 159), and the accompanying Exhibits (ECF Nos. 158-1 through 158- 9 7; 158-10 through 158-18; ECF Nos. 159-1 through 159-7; 159-10 through 159-18). 10 11 12 13 14 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that TPOV may alternatively WITHDRAW the motion to seal and file unredacted and unsealed versions of the Opposition, Cross Motion, and Exhibits. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that TPOV has until 9:00 am on Monday, February 10, 2020 to comply with the Order. DATED this 7th day of February 2020. _________________________ CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?