Gardner v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

Filing 54

ORDER granting 53 Stipulation; Re: 47 Motion for Summary Judgment, 48 Motion for Summary Judgment, Replies due by 1/18/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/14/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Case 2:17-cv-00352-PAL Document 53 Filed 01/10/19 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

LYSSA S. ANDERSON
Nevada Bar No. 5781
RYAN W. DANIELS
Nevada Bar No. 13094
KAEMPFER CROWELL
1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Suite 650
Las Vegas, Nevada 89135
Telephone: [phone]
Fax:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10
11
12
13

ROBERT J. GARDNER, individually, and as
Co-Special Administrator of the Estate of
GARRETT E. GARDNER, deceased; KIM
GARDNER, individually, and as Co-Special
Administrator of the Estate of GARRETT E.
GARDNER, deceased; and, The ESTATE OF
GARRETT E. GARDNER,
Plaintiffs,

14
vs.

Case No.: 2:17-cv-00352 JCM-PAL

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY
IN SUPPORT OF LVMPD’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
NAPHCARE’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(First Request)

15
16
17
18
19
20

LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT, a political subdivision of the
State of Nevada and the County of Clark and
operator of Clark County Detention Center;
NAPHCARE, medical care providers for the
Clark County Detention Center, DOE
NAPHCARE DEFENDANTS I-X, individuals
employed by NAPHCARE; DOE CCDC
DEFENDANTS I-X, Corrections Officers
employed at CCDC; and ROE ENTITIES I-X,
inclusive,

21
Defendants.
22
23
24
2252675_1 [6943.121]

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:17-cv-00352-PAL Document 53 Filed 01/10/19 Page 2 of 3

1

Plaintiffs hereby agree and stipulate with Defendant Las Vegas Metropolitan Police

2

Department ("LVMPD") and Defendant Naphcare, Inc. (“Naphcare”) to extend the deadline for

3

LVMPD and Naphcare to file their respective Replies in Support of their Motions for Summary

4

Judgment, [ECF No. 47 and 48] currently set for January 11, 2019, for an additional seven (7)

5

days, until January 18, 2018. This is the first requested extension of LVMPD’s reply and

6

Naphcare’s reply. LVMPD and Naphcare request the extension because counsel require

7

additional time to prepare the replies.

8

///

9

///

10

///

11

///

12

///

13

///

14

///

15

///

16

///

17

///

18

///

19

///

20

///

21

///

22

///

23

///

24

///
2252675_1 [6943.121]

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:17-cv-00352-PAL Document 53 Filed 01/10/19 Page 3 of 3

1

The extension will not prejudice any party and will allow LVMPD and Naphcare to

2

adequately brief their replies in support of their respective motions for summary judgment filed

3

with this Court. The parties are not delaying the conclusion of this matter; no trial date has yet

4

been ordered.
DATED this 9th day of January, 2019.

5
6

KAEMPFER CROWELL

MESSNER REEVES LLP

By:

7

By:

8
9
10

/s/ Lyssa S. Anderson
LYSSA S. ANDERSON
Nevada Bar No. 5781
1980 Festival Plaza Drive, #650
Las Vegas, Nevada 89135
Attorneys for LVMPD

11

/s/ Lauren D. Calvert
LAUREN D. CALVERT
Nevada Bar No. 10534
8945 W. Russell Road, Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89148
Attorney for Plaintiffs

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH
12
13
14
15

By:

/s/ S. Brent Vogel
S. BRENT VOGEL, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6858
6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
Attorneys for Defendant Naphcare

16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED.

18
19

DATED this 14th day of January, 2019.

20
21

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

22
23
24
2252675_1 [6943.121]

Page 3 of 3