Brown v. Baker et al

Filing 36

ORDER. It is ordered that the motions for extension of time (ECF Nos. 23 , 24 , 26 , 27 , 31 , and 34 ) are all GRANTED nunc pro tunc as of their respective filing dates. It is further ordered that respondents' reply in support of their 28 motion to dismiss is due on or before 3/1/2019. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 3/4/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7

***

8
9
10

TONY ONTIA BROWN,

Case No. 2:17-cv-00387-GMN-CWH
Petitioner,

ORDER

v.

11
12
13

TIMOTHY FILSON, et al.,
Respondents.

14
15

Pending before the court in this habeas corpus proceeding are several motions to

16

extend time filed by both parties in relation to the filing and briefing of respondents’ motion

17

to dismiss (ECF No. 28). ECF Nos. 23, 24, 26, 27, 31, and 34. All of the motions are

18

supported by good cause. In addition, the motion to dismiss and petitioner’s response

19

thereto (ECF No. 32) have been filed without apparent prejudice to the opposing party.

20
21
22
23
24

It is therefore ordered that the motions for extension of time (ECF Nos. 23, 24, 26,
27, 31, and 34) are all granted nunc pro tunc as of their respective filing dates.
It is further ordered that respondents’ reply in support of their motion to dismiss
(ECF No. 28) is due on or before March 1, 2019.
March
4
DATED THIS ___ day of _____________, 2019.

25
26
27
28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE