Pineda v. AMCO Insurance Company

Filing 25

ORDER Granting 23 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 17 Motion for Summary Judgment (First Request). Responses due by 7/21/2017. Replies due by 8/8/2017. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/20/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 JOHN C. COURTNEY, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 11092 CHRISTOPHER BLAKESLEY, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 11922 LBC LAW GROUP 3215 W. Charleston Blvd., Ste. 120 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 Ph.: (702) 608-3030 Fax: (702) 463-4443 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 11 EMIGDIO MARTINEZ PINEDA, an individual, 12 Case No.: 2:17-cv-00390-GMN-GWF Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 AMCO INSURANCE COMPANY, NATIONWIDE INSURANCE, an Ohio Corporation, qualified in Nevada, DOES IX, and ROES XI-XX, 15 16 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND REPLY IN SUPPORT THEREOF Defendants. 17 (First Request) 18 19 The above-referenced parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby 20 agree and stipulate, subject to this Court’s approval, to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file his 21 Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 17) currently set for July 19, 22 2017, for an additional two (2) days, until and including July 21, 2017. Furthermore, the parties 23 hereby agree and stipulate, subject to this Court’s approval, that Defendant shall have an additional 24 two (2) court days to file its Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, through and 25 26 including August 8, 2017. This is the first requested extension of this deadline between the parties. 27 The extension is being requested as Plaintiff’s counsel requires several additional days to complete 28 the Response. 1 1 The extension is requested in good faith and will not prejudice any party and will allow 2 Plaintiff a few additional days to complete his Response, as well as allow Defendant the same extra 3 few days to complete its Reply. This parties are not delaying the conclusion of this matter by way 4 of trial or otherwise; no trial date has yet been ordered. 5 6 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 7 8 DATED this 19th day of July, 2017. DATED this 19th day of July, 2017. 9 LBC LAW GROUP LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGARRD & SMITH LLP By: /s/ John C. Courtney, Esq. JOHN C. COURTNEY, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 11092 CHRISTOPHER L. BLAKESLEY, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 11922 3215 W. Charleston Blvd., Ste. 120 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 Attorneys for Plaintiff By: /s/ Cheryl A. Grames, Esq. PRISCILLA L. O’BRIANT, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 008181 CHERYL A. GRAMES, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 012752 6385 S. Rainbow Blvd., Ste. 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89118 Attorneys for Defendant 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 July IT IS SO ORDERED this20 day of ___________, 2017. ___ 20 21 22 ________________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?