Pineda v. AMCO Insurance Company

Filing 25

ORDER Granting 23 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 17 Motion for Summary Judgment (First Request). Responses due by 7/21/2017. Replies due by 8/8/2017. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/20/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

JOHN C. COURTNEY, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 11092
CHRISTOPHER BLAKESLEY, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 11922
LBC LAW GROUP
3215 W. Charleston Blvd., Ste. 120
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
Ph.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9
10
11

EMIGDIO MARTINEZ PINEDA, an
individual,

12

Case No.: 2:17-cv-00390-GMN-GWF

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

AMCO INSURANCE COMPANY,
NATIONWIDE INSURANCE, an Ohio
Corporation, qualified in Nevada, DOES IX, and ROES XI-XX,

15
16

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
REPLY IN SUPPORT THEREOF

Defendants.

17

(First Request)

18
19

The above-referenced parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby

20

agree and stipulate, subject to this Court’s approval, to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file his

21

Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 17) currently set for July 19,

22

2017, for an additional two (2) days, until and including July 21, 2017. Furthermore, the parties

23

hereby agree and stipulate, subject to this Court’s approval, that Defendant shall have an additional

24
two (2) court days to file its Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, through and
25
26

including August 8, 2017. This is the first requested extension of this deadline between the parties.

27

The extension is being requested as Plaintiff’s counsel requires several additional days to complete

28

the Response.
1

1

The extension is requested in good faith and will not prejudice any party and will allow

2

Plaintiff a few additional days to complete his Response, as well as allow Defendant the same extra

3

few days to complete its Reply. This parties are not delaying the conclusion of this matter by way

4
of trial or otherwise; no trial date has yet been ordered.
5
6

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

7
8

DATED this 19th day of July, 2017.

DATED this 19th day of July, 2017.

9

LBC LAW GROUP

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGARRD & SMITH LLP

By: /s/ John C. Courtney, Esq.
JOHN C. COURTNEY, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 11092
CHRISTOPHER L. BLAKESLEY, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 11922
3215 W. Charleston Blvd., Ste. 120
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
Attorneys for Plaintiff

By: /s/ Cheryl A. Grames, Esq.
PRISCILLA L. O’BRIANT, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 008181
CHERYL A. GRAMES, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 012752
6385 S. Rainbow Blvd., Ste. 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
Attorneys for Defendant

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

July
IT IS SO ORDERED this20 day of ___________, 2017.
___

20
21
22

________________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

23
24
25
26
27
28
2