Rofoli v. Zurich American Insurance Company

Filing 38

ORDER Granting 37 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. Case terminated. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 11/27/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-00391-JAD-PAL Document 37 Filed 11/27/17 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FREIMAN LAW Lawrence W. Freiman Nevada State Bar No. 10588 lawrence@freimanlaw.com Michael Freiman (pro hac vice) michael@freimanlaw.com 100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 700 Santa Monica, CA 90401 Telephone: (310) 917-1024 Facsimile: (888) 835-8511 Michelle M. Jones Nevada State Bar No. 8505 703 S. Eighth Street Las Vegas, NV 89101 Telephone: (702) 385-1067 Facsimile: (702) 386-9825 Designated Attorney for Service in Nevada Only 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff THEO ROFOLI 12 [additional counsel on next page] 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 16 17 THEO ROFOLI, 18 19 20 21 Case No. 2:17-cv-00391-JAD-PAL Plaintiff, v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY; and DOES 1-20, inclusive, Defendants. 22 [Assigned to United States District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey] JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Complaint Filed: Trial Date: February 8, 2017 None Set ECF Nos. 31, 37 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 42513850v.1 Case 2:17-cv-00391-JAD-PAL Document 37 Filed 11/27/17 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Erin Dougherty Foley (pro hac vice) edfoley@seyfarth.com 233 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 8000 Chicago, IL 60606-6448 Telephone: (312) 460-5000 Facsimile: (312) 460-7000 Jennifer R. Nunez (pro hac vice) jnunez@seyfarth.com 2029 Century Park East, Suite 3500 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (310) 277-7200 Facsimile: (310) 201-5219 BAUMAN LOEWE WITT & MAXWELL, PLLC Michael C. Mills Nevada State Bar No. 3534 mmills@blwmlawfirm.com 3650 N. Rancho Drive, Suite 114 Las Vegas, NV 89130 Telephone: (702) 240-6060 Facsimile: (702) 240-4267 Designated Attorney for Service in Nevada Only Attorneys for Defendant ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 42513850v.1 Case 2:17-cv-00391-JAD-PAL Document 37 Filed 11/27/17 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) Plaintiff, Theo Rofoli, and Defendant, Zurich American Insurance Company, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that this action shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Further, each party will bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees. IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: November 27, 2017 Respectfully submitted, SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 8 9 By: 10 11 12 13 DATED: November 27, 2017 /s/ Jennifer R. Nunez Erin Dougherty Foley Jennifer R. Nunez Attorneys for Defendant Zurich American Insurance Company Respectfully submitted, FREIMAN LAW 14 15 By: /s/ Lawrence W. Freiman Lawrence W. Freiman Michael Freiman Attorneys for Plaintiff Theo Rofoli 16 17 18 19 20 Pursuant to LR IC 5-1, the filer attests that all other signatories listed, and on whose behalf this filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing. 21 ORDER 22 23 In consideration of the Parties’ Joint Stipulation of Dismissal, it is hereby ordered that the above 24 captioned lawsuit is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party will bear its own costs, expenses, 25 and attorneys’ fees. The Joint Stipulation to Amendto CLOSE Order [ECF No. 31] as moot. The The Clerk of Court is directed Schedule THIS CASE. 26 Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 , 2017 28 __________________________________ ___ Judge Jennifer Dorsey _ _ _ _ __________________________________ U.S. District_________________ U.S. District Ju2017Jennifer Dors trict Judge Jennifer D ct Judge t dg fe Dorsey November 27, 27, UNITED November 27 2017 STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3 JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 42513850v.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?