Rofoli v. Zurich American Insurance Company
Filing
38
ORDER Granting 37 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. Case terminated. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 11/27/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Case 2:17-cv-00391-JAD-PAL Document 37 Filed 11/27/17 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
FREIMAN LAW
Lawrence W. Freiman
Nevada State Bar No. 10588
lawrence@freimanlaw.com
Michael Freiman (pro hac vice)
michael@freimanlaw.com
100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 700
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Telephone:
(310) 917-1024
Facsimile:
(888) 835-8511
Michelle M. Jones
Nevada State Bar No. 8505
703 S. Eighth Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Telephone:
(702) 385-1067
Facsimile:
(702) 386-9825
Designated Attorney for Service in Nevada Only
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff
THEO ROFOLI
12
[additional counsel on next page]
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
16
17
THEO ROFOLI,
18
19
20
21
Case No. 2:17-cv-00391-JAD-PAL
Plaintiff,
v.
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE
COMPANY; and DOES 1-20, inclusive,
Defendants.
22
[Assigned to United States District Judge
Jennifer A. Dorsey]
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE
Complaint Filed:
Trial Date:
February 8, 2017
None Set
ECF Nos. 31, 37
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
42513850v.1
Case 2:17-cv-00391-JAD-PAL Document 37 Filed 11/27/17 Page 2 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Erin Dougherty Foley (pro hac vice)
edfoley@seyfarth.com
233 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 8000
Chicago, IL 60606-6448
Telephone:
(312) 460-5000
Facsimile:
(312) 460-7000
Jennifer R. Nunez (pro hac vice)
jnunez@seyfarth.com
2029 Century Park East, Suite 3500
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone:
(310) 277-7200
Facsimile:
(310) 201-5219
BAUMAN LOEWE WITT & MAXWELL, PLLC
Michael C. Mills
Nevada State Bar No. 3534
mmills@blwmlawfirm.com
3650 N. Rancho Drive, Suite 114
Las Vegas, NV 89130
Telephone:
(702) 240-6060
Facsimile:
(702) 240-4267
Designated Attorney for Service in Nevada Only
Attorneys for Defendant
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
42513850v.1
Case 2:17-cv-00391-JAD-PAL Document 37 Filed 11/27/17 Page 3 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) Plaintiff, Theo Rofoli, and
Defendant, Zurich American Insurance Company, by and through their respective undersigned counsel,
hereby stipulate and agree that this action shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Further, each
party will bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: November 27, 2017
Respectfully submitted,
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
8
9
By:
10
11
12
13
DATED: November 27, 2017
/s/ Jennifer R. Nunez
Erin Dougherty Foley
Jennifer R. Nunez
Attorneys for Defendant
Zurich American Insurance Company
Respectfully submitted,
FREIMAN LAW
14
15
By: /s/ Lawrence W. Freiman
Lawrence W. Freiman
Michael Freiman
Attorneys for Plaintiff Theo Rofoli
16
17
18
19
20
Pursuant to LR IC 5-1, the filer attests that all other signatories listed, and on whose behalf this
filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing.
21
ORDER
22
23
In consideration of the Parties’ Joint Stipulation of Dismissal, it is hereby ordered that the above
24
captioned lawsuit is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party will bear its own costs, expenses,
25
and attorneys’ fees. The Joint Stipulation to Amendto CLOSE Order [ECF No. 31] as moot. The
The Clerk of Court is directed Schedule THIS CASE.
26
Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
, 2017
28
__________________________________
___ Judge Jennifer Dorsey
_
_
_ _
__________________________________
U.S. District_________________
U.S. District Ju2017Jennifer Dors
trict Judge Jennifer D
ct Judge
t dg
fe Dorsey
November 27,
27,
UNITED November 27 2017
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
3
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
42513850v.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?