Gayler v. State of Nevada et al
Filing
36
ORDER Granting 35 Motion to Extend Time, Re: 31 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/27/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
Case 2:17-cv-00431-JCM-VCF Document 36 Filed 01/27/21 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
BRANDYN GAYLER,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
Case No. 2:17-cv-00431-JCM-VCF
ORDER
v.
STATE OF NEVADA, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
Presently before the court is plaintiff Brandyn Gayler’s motion to extend deadline to file
16
17
response. (ECF No. 35).
18
On January 19, 2020, defendants moved for summary judgment. (ECF No. 31). Plaintiff
19
now moves for an extension of forty-five days to file his response. (ECF No. 35). He states that
20
he requires additional time to review and organize “approximately eight years” of records and
21
handwrite his response. (Id.).
22
This court finds that plaintiff’s request is appropriate and made in good faith. There is no
23
indication that this motion is made for dilatory reasons, and defendants will not be prejudiced by
24
plaintiff’s first request for extension.
25
...
26
...
27
...
28
...
Case 2:17-cv-00431-JCM-VCF Document 36 Filed 01/27/21 Page 2 of 2
1
Accordingly,
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that plaintiff’s motion for
3
4
extension of time to file response (ECF No. 35) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED.
DATED January 27, 2021.
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?