Zimmerman v. YSR, Inc.
Filing
19
ORDER Granting 18 Stipulation for Extension of Time. YSR, Inc. answer due 5/31/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 5/15/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Case 2:17-cv-00438-GMN-GWF Document 18 Filed 05/12/17 Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sheri M. Thome, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 008657
Chad C. Butterfield, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 010532
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
300 South Fourth Street, 11th Floor
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
(702) 727-1400; FAX (702) 727-1401
sheri.thome@wilsonelser.com
chad.butterfield@wilsonelser.com
Attorneys for Defendant YSR, Inc.
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11
12
KEVIN ZIMMERMAN, an individual;
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-00438-GMN-GWF
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT
YSR, Inc.
(First Request)
16
Defendant.
17
18
19
Defendant, YSR, Inc. (hereinafter “Defendant”), by and through its counsel of record,
20
SHERI M. THOME, ESQ. and CHAD BUTTERFIELD, ESQ., of the law firm WILSON, ELSER,
21
MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP, and Plaintiff, KEVIN ZIMMERMAN, by and
22
through his counsel of record, WHITNEY C. WILCHER, ESQ. of the law offices of THE
23
WILCHER FIRM hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for filing a responsive pleading
24
to May 31, 2017.
25
Plaintiff has represented to Defendant that service of the summons and complaint in this
26
matter were effected on April 17, 2017. Based on that representation, Defendant's responsive
27
pleading was originally due on or before May 8, 2017. Plaintiff has graciously agreed to extend the
28
responsive pleading deadline to May 31, 2017.
1141452v.1
Case 2:17-cv-00438-GMN-GWF Document 18 Filed 05/12/17 Page 2 of 4
1
This stipulation is submitted in compliance with LR IA 6-1. Good cause exists for the
2
requested extension, as Defendant is in the process of conducting an internal survey with respect to
3
the alleged ADA violations identified in the Complaint. The results of this survey are necessary for
4
Defendant to form its defense strategy in this case. Accordingly, the parties agree that the requested
5
extension furthers the interests of this litigation and is not being requested in bad faith or to delay
6
these proceedings unnecessarily.
7
The parties' failure to file this stipulation on or before May 8, 2017 was the result of
8
excusable neglect, as Defendant was unaware of the date of service of the summons and complaint
9
until after the deadline had already expired. Defendant had requested from Plaintiff the date of
10
service of the summons and complaint, which Plaintiff only recently provided. Accordingly, the
11
parties respectfully submit that the failure to file this stipulation on or before the expiration of the
12
original responsive pleading deadline was the result of excusable neglect.
13
This is the parties’ first request for extension of the deadline.
14
DATED this 12th day of May, 2017.
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,
EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
15
16
/s/ Sheri M. Thome
Sheri M. Thome, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 008657
Chad C. Butterfield, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 010532
300 South Fourth Street, 11th Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Attorneys for Defendant YSR, Inc.
17
18
19
20
21
DATED this 12th day of May, 2017.
THE WILCHER FIRM
22
/s/ Whitney C. Wilcher
Whitney C. Wilcher, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 7212
8465 West Sahara Avenue
Suite 111-236
Las Vegas, NV 89117
Attorney for Plaintiff Kevin Zimmerman
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 4
1141452v.1
Case 2:17-cv-00438-GMN-GWF Document 18 Filed 05/12/17 Page 3 of 4
1
ORDER
2
3
4
GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.
15th
Dated this _____ day of _____________, 2017.
May
5
________________________________________
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 3 of 4
1141452v.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?