U.S. Bank National Association v. Spinnaker Point Avenue Trust, et al

Filing 107

ORDER Granting 106 Stipulation Re: 104 Motion for Reconsideration. Replies due by 3/25/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 3/17/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 MAURICE WUTSCHER LLP Patrick J. Kane (Pro Hac Vice) 440 Stevens Avenue, Suite 200 Solana Beach, California 92075 Phone No.: (858) 381-7860 Email: pkane@mauricewutscher.com Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, U.S. Bank National Association as Legal Title Trustee on behalf of USROF IV Legal Title Trust 2015-1 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 12 USROF IV LEGAL TITLE TRUST 2015-1, BY U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS LEGAL TITLE TRUSTEE, 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 16 17 18 19 SPINNAKER POINT AVENUE TRUST; RIVER GLIDER AVENUE TRUST; SATICOY BAY, LLC SERIES 5982 SPINNAKER POINT AVENUE; MOUNTAIN GATE AT SUNRISE MOUNTAIN HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION; ABSOLUTE COLLECTION SERVICES, LLC, Defendant. 20 21 22 SATICOY BAY, LLC SERIES 5982 SPINNAKER POINT AVENUE, Counterclaimant, 23 24 25 26 27 vs. USROF IV LEGAL TITLE TRUST 2015-1, BY U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS LEGAL TITLE TRUSTEE, LLC, Counter-Defendant 28 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to File Reply Brief ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:17-cv-00445-APG-VCFEJY FIRST STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR TRUSTEE TO FILE ITS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION [FIRST REQUEST] Current Reply Deadline: March 21, 2022 Proposed Deadline: March 25, 2022 1 2:17-cv-00445-APG-VCF 1 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, PROF-2013-M4-Legal Title Trust IV, by U.S. Bank 2 National Association, (“Trustee”), and Defendants and Counterclaimants Saticoy Bay, LLC 3 Series 5982 and Spinnaker Point Avenue (“Defendants”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by their 4 attorneys, hereby submit the following Stipulation and Order to Continue the March 21, 2022 5 deadline for Trustee to File its Reply Brief in support of its Motion for Reconsideration to March 6 25, 2022 pursuant to LR IA 6-1 and LR 7-1 (the “Stipulation”). This Stipulation is submitted in 7 good faith and not intended to cause any delay to this Court. 8 9 10 RECITALS WHEREAS, Trustee’s predecessor-in-interest filed the instant action on February 9, 2017. See Dkt. 1. 11 WHEREAS, on August 22, 2017 Trustee’s predecessor-in-interest filed an Amended 12 Complaint asserting the following claims: (1) quiet title; (2) declaratory relief; (3) permanent and 13 preliminary injunction; and (5) unjust enrichment (the “FAC”). See Dkt. 27. 14 WHEREAS, on October 10, 2019, Defendants filed their Answer and Affirmative 15 Defenses to the FAC and filed the following counterclaims against the Trustee: (1) quiet title; and 16 (2) declaratory relief. See Dkt. 49. 17 WHEREAS, on February 28, 2022, Trustee filed its Motion for Reconsideration 18 concerning this Court’s prior Order granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss in light of the recent 19 decision in U.S. Bank v. Thunder Props., Inc., Supreme Court Case No. 8112 (the “Motion to 20 Reconsider”). 21 22 23 24 25 26 WHEREAS, on March 14, 2022, Defendants filed their Opposition to Trustee’s Motion to Reconsider. WHEREAS, Trustee’s Reply Brief in support of its Motion to Reconsider is currently due no later than March 21, 2022. WHEREAS, an unexpected power outage resulted in Trustee’s counsel needing a brief five-day extension to file its Reply in support of its Motion to Reconsider. 27 WHEREAS, this Stipulation is submitted in good faith and not to cause unnecessary delay. 28 WHEREAS, counsel for Trustee contacted counsel for Defendants, who advised that Stipulation to Extend Deadline to File Reply Brief 2 2:17-cv-00445-APG-VCF 1 Defendants have no objection to the request. 2 3 4 5 Agreement NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties to this litigation as follows: 1. The March 21, 2022 deadline for Trustee to file its Reply Brief in Support of its 6 Motion to Reconsider be extended to March 25, 2022. 7 Dated: March 17, 2022 MAURICE WUTSCHER LLP 8 /s/ Patrick J. Kane Patrick J. Kane (Pro Hac Vice) 440 Stevens Avenue, Suite 200 Solana Beach, California 92075 Phone No.: (858) 381-7860 Email: pkane@mauricewutscher.com 9 10 11 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, U.S. Bank National Association as Legal Title Trustee on behalf of USROF IV Legal Title Trust 2015-1 13 14 15 ROGER P. ASSOCIATES Dated: March 17, 2022 16 17 CROTEAU & /s/ Christopher L. Benner Roger P. Croteau Christopher L. Benner 2810 Charleston Boulevard, No. H-75 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 Phone No.: (702) 254-7775 Email: receptionist@croteaulaw.com chris@croteaulaw.com 18 19 20 21 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimants, 22 23 SPINNAKER POINT AVENUE TRUST, RIVER GLIDER AVENUE TRUST, and SATICOY BAY, LLC SERIES 5982 SPINNAKER POINT AVENUE 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to File Reply Brief 3 2:17-cv-00445-APG-VCF 1 Signature Attestation 2 I hereby attest under the penalty of perjury that on March 17, 2022, counsel for defendants 3 approved this Stipulation and gave me permission to electronically sign this Stipulation on his 4 behalf. /s/ Patrick J. Kane Patrick Kane 5 6 7 8 ORDER 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated this 17 day of March 2022. 11 ________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to File Reply Brief 4 2:17-cv-00445-APG-VCF 1 Certificate of Service 2 I certify that on March 17, 2022, a copy of the foregoing was filed and served 3 electronically in the ECF system. Notice of this filing will be sent to the parties of record by 4 operation of the Court’s electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court’s 5 system: 6 7 /s/ Patrick J. Kane Patrick Kane 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to File Reply Brief 5 2:17-cv-00445-APG-VCF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?