Banerjee et al v. Continental Incorporated, Inc. et al

Filing 14

ORDER Granting 13 Stipulation to Extend Deadlines re 7 , 8 MOTIONS to Dismiss . (Responses due by 6/27/2017., Replies due by 7/11/2017.) Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 6/5/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Case 2:17-cv-00466-APG-GWF Document 13 Filed 06/05/17 Page 1 of 3

JEFFREY I. PITEGOFF, ESQ.
1 Nevada Bar No. 005458
MORRIS, SULLIVAN, LEMKUL & PITEGOFF, LLP
2 3770 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 170
Las Vegas, NV 89169
3 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
4 Attorney for Plaintiffs
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7 ADRISH BANERJEE, an individual, and
YAN HE, an individual,
8
Plaintiffs,
9 vs.

Case No.: 2:17-cv-00466-APG-GWF

STIPULATION TO EXTEND
DEADLINES TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
(ECF DOC NOS. 7 AND 8)

10 CONTINENTAL INCORPORATED, INC.,
d/b/a CONTINENTAL ENTERPRISES, an
11 Indiana Corporation, LEAPERS, INC., a
Michigan Corporation, and DOES 1-10,
12 inclusive,
13

(FIRST REQUEST)

Defendants.

14
15

On May 23, 2017, Defendants, Continental Incorporated, Inc. and Leapers, Inc. filed a

16 Special Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to NRS 41.635-70 (Anti-SLAPP) and also a Motion to Dismiss
17 Under rule 12(B)(6) (ECF Doc Nos. 7 and 8). The current deadline for responses to these Motions
18 to Dismiss is Tuesday, June 6, 2017.
19

Due to Defense Counsel’s prior commitments and scheduling issues, more time is needed to

20 respond to the Motion to Dismiss and the Anti-SLAPP motion. Plaintiff initially requested and was
21 granted a lengthy extension to respond to the Complaint. Accordingly, the parties believe that
22 extending the response and reply deadlines is fair and that doing so will not prejudice any party or
23 the Court’s schedule. This is the first request for an extension of these deadlines.
24

The parties hereto, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate and

25 agree to extend the deadline for Plaintiffs to respond to Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss by three
26 (3) weeks, of up to and including June 27, 2107. The parties additionally agree to extend the
27 deadline for Defendants to file their replies to the responses by two weeks, from June 27, 2017 to
28 July 11, 2017.
1

Case 2:17-cv-00466-APG-GWF Document 13 Filed 06/05/17 Page 2 of 3

1

Pursuant to NRS 41.660(f), this Court is to rule on the Anti-SLAPP motion to dismiss within

2 20 judicial days after the motion is served upon plaintiff, June 12, 2017, therefore, the parties also
3 request that the Court extend the time period to rule on the Anti-SLAPP motion to dismiss to 20
4 judicial days after Defendants’ reply deadline, or July 31, 2017.
5
6

DATED: June 5, 2017.

DATED: June 5, 2017

7

MORRIS SULLIVAN LEMKUL
& PITEGOFF

CARBAJAL & MCNUTT, LLP

/s/ Jeffrey I. Pitegoff__________________
Jeffrey I Pitegoff, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 5458
3770 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite. 170
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

/s/ Matt Wolf____
Matthew C. Wolf, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10801
625 S. Eighth Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

8
9
10
11
12

____

13
14
15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.

17
______________________________
UNITED STATE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: June 5, 2017.
DATED: _____________________________

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2