Banerjee et al v. Continental Incorporated, Inc. et al

Filing 71

ORDER granting 70 Stipulation re: 68 Motion for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 7/19/2018. Replies due by 7/30/2018. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 6/29/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Case 2:17-cv-00466-APG-GWF Document 70 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 3

1 JEFFREY I. PITEGOFF, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 005458
2 PITEGOFF LAW OFFICE INC.
330 E. Charleston Boulevard, Suite 100
3 Las Vegas, Nevada 89104
Telephone: [phone]
4 Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
5 Attorney for Defendants
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8 ANDRISH BANERJEE, an individual, and
YAN HE, an individual,
9
Plaintiffs,
10 vs.

Case No.: 2:17-cv-00466-APG-GWF (LEAD)
STIPULATION TO EXTEND
PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
DEFENDANTS’ REPLY
(Docket No. 68)

11 CONTINENTAL INCORPORATED, INC.,
d/b/a CONTINENTAL ENTERPRISES, an
12 Indiana Corporation, LEAPERS, INC., a
Michigan Corporation, and DOES 1-10,
13 inclusive,
14

(First Request to Extend this Deadline)

Defendants.

15
16

Defendants,

CONTINENTAL INCORPORATED, INC.

d/b/a CONTINENTAL

17 ENTERPRISES and LEAPERS, INC. filed their Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 68),
18 on June 15, 2018, in the above-entitled action. Plaintiffs, ADRISH BANERJEE and YAN HE’s
19 Response is currently due Monday, July 2, 2019. This is the first request to extend this deadline.
20

The parties hereto, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate and

21 agree to extend the deadline for Plaintiffs to file their Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary
22 Judgment of up to and including, Thursday, July 19, 2018. Defendants shall have until Monday,
23 July 30, 2018 to file their Reply to Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary
24 Judgment.
25

The reasons for this request are the following:

26

1.

Plaintiffs’ counsel was involved in a car accident that was caused by an apparent

27 intoxicated motorist. As a result, he has been required to take a number of days off in order to seek
28 treatment, including actively attending physical therapy appointments and diagnostic testing, in
1

Case 2:17-cv-00466-APG-GWF Document 70 Filed 06/28/18 Page 2 of 3

1 order to recover, thus creating a backlog of deadlines and tasks to complete. He is also expected to
2 miss additional time from work as the treatment continues.
3

2.

Additionally, with the arguments raised in Defendants’ Motion for Summary

4 Judgment, Plaintiffs require additional time within which to properly and thoroughly respond to
5 same. Plaintiffs’ counsel is requesting approximately three (3) additional weeks to file and serve its
6 Response to Defendants’ Motion (Docket No. 68)..
7

3.

This Stipulation is entered into in good faith and not to cause undue delay.

8

DATED: June 28, 2018.

DATED: June 28, 2018

9

PITEGOFF LAW OFFICE INC.

TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLP

/s/ Jeffrey I. Pitegoff
Jeffrey I Pitegoff, Esq.
330 E. Charleston Boulevard, Suite 100
Las Vegas, NV 89104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

/s/ Tracy Betz
Tracy Betz, Esq.
One Indiana Square, Suite 3500
Indianapolis, IN 46204-2023
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Admitted Pro Hac Vice

10
11
12
13
14

Matthew C. Wolf, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10801
MCNUT LAW FIRM, P.C.
625 South Eighth Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants

15
16
17
18
19
20
21

ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary

22 Judgment, in the above-entitled matter (Docket No.: 68) is due on Thursday, July 19, 2018 and
23 Defendants shall have until Monday, July 30, 2018 to file their Reply to Plaintiffs’ Response to
24 Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26

______________________________
UNITED STATE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: June 29, 2018.
DATED: _____________________________

27
28
2