Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al v. Newport Cove Condominium Unit Owners' Association, Inc. et al
Filing
82
ORDER denying 76 Motion to Enforce; vacating 81 Order, vacating 80 Order, Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/14/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
8
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC and
FEDERA HOME LOAN MORTGAGE
CORPORATION,
9
12
ORDER
Plaintiff(s),
10
11
Case No. 2:17-CV-474 JCM (NJK)
v.
NEWPORT COVE CONDOMINIUM UNIT
OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, INC., et al.,
Defendant(s).
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Presently before the court is the matter of Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al v. Newport Cove
Condominium Unit Owners’ Association, Inc. et al, case no. 2:17-cv-00474-JCM-NJK.
Presently under the court’s consideration is Kung & Brown’s (“K&B”) motion to withdraw
as counsel of record and to enforce attorney’s lien. (ECF No. 76). The clerk of the court notified
K&B that its motion was not filed due to its violation of Local Rule Part IC 2-2(b), which provides
that “[f]or each type of relief requested or purpose of the document, a separate document must be
filed and a separate event must be selected for that document.” LR IC 2-2(b).
K&B has filed neither a motion to withdraw as counsel of record nor a motion to enforce
attorney’s lien that complies with local rules. To the extent that K&B’s motion remains pending,
the court will deny it without prejudice for failure to comply with local rules.1
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
1
It appears that K&B filed a notice of withdrawal of the motion on January 17, 2019, but
the document was terminated as having been filed in error the following day.
1
The court has previously entered two orders regarding K&B’s improper motion to enforce
2
attorney’s lien, one on August 2 and the other on August 12. (ECF Nos. 80, 81). Having dismissed
3
the underlying motion, the court hereby vacates those orders.2
4
Accordingly,
5
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that K&B’s motion to
6
withdraw as counsel of record and to enforce attorney’s lien (ECF No. 76) be, and the same hereby
7
is, DENIED without prejudice.
8
9
10
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the court’s previous orders regarding K&B’s motion
(ECF Nos. 80, 81) be, and the same hereby are, VACATED.
DATED August 14, 2019.
11
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Consistent with the court’s August 12 order, however, K&B is instructed to include
itemized billing statements with its motion to enforce attorney’s lien, should it choose to file one
that complies with local rules.
2
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?