Weise v. Henderson Hospitality LLC et al

Filing 30

ORDER Granting 29 Stipulation of Dismissal. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own attorney's fees and costs. The Court, however, rejects the parties' broad request to retain ju risdiction in the event "any dispute" arises. See Mitchell v. Maurer, 293 U.S. 237, 244 (1934) (holding that parties cannot confer subject matter jurisdiction by agreement where it otherwise does not exist). The Court must have an independent basis for jurisdiction over any dispute. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/26/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 Veronica Arechederra Hall, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 5855 2 Email: Veronica.Hall@lewisbrisbois.com Cayla Witty, Esq. 3 Nevada Bar No. 12897 4 Email: Cayla.Witty@lewisbrisbois.com LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 5 6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89118 6 Telephone: 702.893.3383 7 Facsimile: 702.893.3789 Attorneys for Defendant 8 Henderson Hospitality LLC. 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 *** 13 JOSHUA WEISE, 14 CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-00480-GMN-GWF Plaintiffs, 15 vs. 16 HENDERSON HOSPITALITY, LLC d/b/a HAMPTON INN & SUITES LAS VEGAS17 HENDERSON; EMPLOYEE(S)/AGENT(S) DOES 1-10; AND ROE CORPORATIONS 18 11-20, inclusive 19 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Defendants. 20 21 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Plaintiff Joshua 22 Weise, by and through his attorney, and Defendant Henderson Hospitality, LLC, d/b/a as 23 Hampton Inn & Suites Las Vegas, by and through its attorneys LEWIS BRISBOIS 24 BISGAARD & SMITH LLP, that all of Plaintiff’s claims, and causes of action against 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / LEWIS 28 / / / BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4841-3940-6922.1 1 Defendant in the above-entitled action shall be dismissed, with prejudice, each party to 2 bear their own attorney’s fees and costs. 3 The parties agree that this Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter in the 4 event any dispute arises. 5 6 DATED: July 11, 2017 7 8 9 10 11 12 /s/ Christian Gabroy Christian Gabroy, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8805 The District at Green Valley Ranch 170 South Green Valley Parkway Suite 280 Henderson, Nevada 89012 Attorneys for Plaintiff 13 14 /s/ Cayla Witty Veronica Arechederra Hall, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 5855 Cayla Witty, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12897 Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP 6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89118 Attorneys for Defendant Henderson Hospitality LLC 15 16 ORDER 17 18 19 20 21 In light of the above stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own attorney's fees and costs. The Court, however, rejects the parties' broad request to retain jurisdiction in the event "any dispute" arises. See Mitchell v. Maurer, 293 U.S. 237, 244 (1934) (holding that parties cannot confer subject matter jurisdiction by agreement where it otherwise does not exist). The Court must have an independent basis for jurisdiction over any dispute. 22 23 24 26 DATED: this ____, in July, 2017. 25 ____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 26 27 LEWIS 28 BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4841-3940-6922.1 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?