A.R.N.H v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
23
ORDER that the Magistrate Judge's 22 Report and Recommendation are ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Plaintiff's 17 Motion to Remand is DENIED and Defendant's 18 and 19 Cross-Motions to Affirm is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court shall enter JUDGMENT for Defendant and against Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 9/27/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
ERICA M. NASH, o/b/o A.R.N.H.,
8
Plaintiff,
9
10
11
Case No. 2:17-cv-00484-KJD-BNW
ORDER
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security.
Defendant.
12
13
Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (#22) of
14
Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler entered September 6, 2019, recommending that Plaintiff’s
15
Motion to Remand (#17) be denied and that Defendant’s Cross-motions to Affirm (#18/19) be
16
granted. Though the time for doing so has passed, Plaintiff has failed to file any objections to the
17
Report and Recommendation.
The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with
18
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and LR IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Report and
20
Recommendation (#22) of the United States Magistrate Judge entered September 6, 2019, should
21
be ADOPTED and AFFIRMED.
22
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
23
Recommendation (#22) entered September 6, 2019, are ADOPTED and AFFIRMED;
24
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (#17) is DENIED;
25
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Cross-motions to Affirm (#18/19) are
26
GRANTED;
27
///
28
///
1
2
3
4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter JUDGMENT for
Defendant and against Plaintiff.
DATED this 27th day of September 2019.
5
______________________________
The Honorable Kent J. Dawson
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?