Anders v. Aristocrat Technologies, Inc.
Filing
9
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the court will not conduct an early neutral evaluation in this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court must terminate the undersigned's designation as the settlement judge in this case. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 3/17/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
10
11
RENE ANDERS,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
)
)
Defendant.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:17-cv-00550-RFB-GWF
ORDER
12
13
At intake, this case was assigned to the court’s Early Neutral Evaluation Program for
14
employment-discrimination cases. (See Notice (ECF No. 4).) Local Rule 16-6(a) defines
15
employment-discrimination cases as cases filed under the following statutes:
16
17
18
19
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq.;
Title I of the Americans With Disabilities Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et
seq.; prohibition of employment discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981; Age
Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 626, et seq.; Equal Pay Act, 29
U.S.C. § 206; Genetic Information NonDiscrimination Act of 2008, 42 U.S.C. §
2000ff, et seq.; Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794; and under
42 U.S.C. § 1983, if the complaint alleges discrimination in employment on the
basis of race, color, gender, national origin, or religion.
20
21
Here, Plaintiff alleges claims for wage violations under Nevada Revised Statutes § 608.005,
22
et seq. (claim one), violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et. seq. (claim two),
23
violation of the Family Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2615, et seq. (claim three), and negligent
24
hiring, training, and supervision (claim four). (See Compl. (ECF No. 1-3).) Given that none of
25
these claims are included in the definition of an employment-discrimination action under Local
26
Rule 16-6(a), the court will not hold an early neutral evaluation conference in this case.
27
28
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the court will not conduct an early neutral evaluation
in this case.
1
2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court must terminate the undersigned’s
designation as the settlement judge in this case.
3
4
DATED: March 17, 2017
5
6
7
______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?