Cervantes v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Detention Service Division et al
Filing
10
ORDERED Clerk shall add Eddie Scott (P#15631); Timothy Dorion (P#14942); Christian Pizan (P#13864); Kevin Patimeteeporn (P#14529); and Dr. Allan Kirkwood, DDS to the docket as defendants in this case pursuant to ECF No. 9 . This action will proceed on Counts I, II, and III, alleging due process violations, against Defendants Eddie Scott, Timothy Dorion, Christian Pizan, Kevin Patimeteeporn, and Dr. Allan Kirkwood. Clerk shall issue summonses for Defendants Eddie Scot t (P#15631); Timothy Dorion (P#14942); Christian Pizan (P#13864); Kevin Patimeteeporn (P#14529); and Dr. Allan Kirkwood, DDS and deliver the same to USM for service. Clerk shall send Plaintiff 5 USM-285 forms. P shall provide said forms to USM by 6/7/2018. The Clerk also will send a copy of the complaint (ECF No. 6) and a copy of this order to the USM for service on Ds. (Summons and copies delivered to USM 5/8/2018.) Henceforth P must serve Ds a copy of every pleading submitt ed for consideration, together with a certificate of service. Clerk is directed to terminate Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department from the docket. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/8/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
LUIS CERVANTEZ,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
Case No. 2:17-cv-00562-MMD-CWH
ORDER
v.
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT DETENTION SERVICE
DIVISION et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
I.
DISCUSSION
17
On March 7, 2018, this Court issued a screening order permitting Counts I, II, and
18
III, alleging due process dental violations, to proceed against Doe jail officials, dentist,
19
and nurses when Plaintiff learned their identities. (ECF No. 5 at 8.) The Court dismissed
20
Defendant Clark County Detention Center with prejudice from the entirety of the case and
21
dismissed Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Detention Service
22
Division and Naphcare without prejudice from the entirety of the case. (Id.) The Court
23
directed the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (“LVMPD”) to enter a limited
24
notice of appearance for the limited purpose of conducting limited pre-service discovery
25
in an effort to ascertain the true identities of the Doe defendants listed on Plaintiff’s four
26
grievances. (Id. at 9.) The Court stated that, after LVMPD identified those individuals, it
27
would enter an order directing service of those individuals via the U.S. Marshal’s Office.
28
(Id. at 7.)
LVMPD has identified Doe defendants as Eddie Scott, Timothy Dorion,
1
Christian Pizan, Kevin Patimeteeporn, and Dr. Allan Kirkwood. (ECF No. 9 at 2). The
2
Court now orders service on those defendants.
3
II.
CONCLUSION
4
For the foregoing reasons, it is ordered that the Clerk of Court add Eddie Scott
5
(P#15631); Timothy Dorion (P#14942); Christian Pizan (P#13864); Kevin Patimeteeporn
6
(P#14529); and Dr. Allan Kirkwood, DDS to the docket as defendants in this case
7
pursuant to ECF No. 9.
8
It is further ordered that pursuant to the Court’s screening order (ECF No. 5) and
9
limited purpose discovery (ECF No. 9), this action will proceed on Counts I, II, and III,
10
alleging due process dental violations, against Defendants Eddie Scott, Timothy Dorion,
11
Christian Pizan, Kevin Patimeteeporn, and Dr. Allan Kirkwood.
12
It is further ordered that the Clerk of Court issue summonses for Defendants Eddie
13
Scott (P#15631); Timothy Dorion (P#14942); Christian Pizan (P#13864); Kevin
14
Patimeteeporn (P#14529); and Dr. Allan Kirkwood, DDS and deliver the same to the U.S.
15
Marshal for service. The Clerk will send to Plaintiff five (5) USM-285 forms. The Clerk
16
also will send a copy of the complaint (ECF No. 6) and a copy of this order to the U.S.
17
Marshal for service on Defendant(s). Plaintiff has thirty (30) days within which to furnish
18
to the U.S. Marshal the required USM-285 forms with relevant information as to each
19
Defendant on each form. Within twenty (20) days after receiving from the U.S. Marshal
20
a copy of the USM-285 forms showing whether service has been accomplished, Plaintiff
21
must file a notice with the Court identifying which Defendant(s) were served and which
22
were not served, if any. If Plaintiff wishes to have service again attempted on an unserved
23
Defendant(s), then a motion must be filed with the Court identifying the unserved
24
Defendant(s) and specifying a more detailed name and/or address for said Defendant(s),
25
or whether some other manner of service should be attempted.
26
It is further ordered that henceforth, Plaintiff must serve upon Defendants or, if
27
appearance has been entered by counsel, upon the attorney(s) a copy of every pleading,
28
motion or other document submitted for consideration by the Court. Plaintiff must include
2
1
with the original paper submitted for filing a certificate stating the date that a true and
2
correct copy of the document was mailed to the Defendants or counsel for the
3
Defendants. The Court may disregard any paper received by a district judge or magistrate
4
judge which has not been filed with the clerk, and any paper received by a district judge,
5
magistrate judge or the clerk which fails to include a certificate of service.
6
It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate Las Vegas
7
Metropolitan Police Department from the docket because it has complied with this Court’s
8
order to provide limited discovery.
9
10
DATED THIS 8th day of May 2018.
11
12
13
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?